2017
DOI: 10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.30227-326594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Öğretmen Adaylarının Olasılık Konusuna İlişkin Alan Bilgilerinin Kavramsal-İşlemsel Bilgi Kapsamında İncelenmesi

Abstract: ÖZETBu araştırmayla, öğretmen adaylarının olasılık konusuna ilişkin alan bilgilerinin kavramsalişlemsel bilgi kapsamında incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Durum çalışması olarak yapılandırılan bu araştırma, kritik durum örneklemesine göre seçilen dört ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adayı ile yürütülmüştür. Öğretmen adaylarının olasılık konusuna ilişkin bilgilerini ortaya çıkarmak için 6 sorudan oluşan soru formu uygulanmış ve klinik görüşmelerle bilgileri hakkında derinlemesine bilgi edinilmiştir. Veri analizi sonucun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the research show that although many regulations have been made in curricula in terms of teaching algebra, students still experience some problems in the subject field of algebra and they cannot successfully complete certain basic tasks such as interpreting an algebraic expression, forming relations between algebraic expressions, knowing what the concept "variable" means, forming identities, and as a result they have conceptual fallacies (Erdem & AktaĢ, 2018;Macgregor & Stacey, 1997;Övez & Çınar, 2018;ġahiner, 2018;ġimĢek, 2018;UlaĢ, 2015;Yıldız, Çiftçi, Akar, & Sezer, 2015). On the other hand, in some studies students were able to use their procedural skills by applying the necessary rules and formulas on algebraic expressions and identities, but they could not explain these procedures conceptually (Baki & Kartal, 2004;Bekdemir, Okur, & Gelen, 2010;Karaaslan & Ay, 2017;Sarı, 2012). However, researchers detect that in learning environments where conceptual and procedural knowledge are supported and managed together, students can complete the tasks successfully, and permanent learning is achieved (Delice & Sevimli, 2010;Orhan, 2013;Örmeci, 2012;Rittle-Johnson, Siegler, & Alibali, 2001;Rittle-Johnson & Koedinger 2009;TaĢtepe, 2018;Yazır, 2015).…”
Section: The Subject Field Of Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the research show that although many regulations have been made in curricula in terms of teaching algebra, students still experience some problems in the subject field of algebra and they cannot successfully complete certain basic tasks such as interpreting an algebraic expression, forming relations between algebraic expressions, knowing what the concept "variable" means, forming identities, and as a result they have conceptual fallacies (Erdem & AktaĢ, 2018;Macgregor & Stacey, 1997;Övez & Çınar, 2018;ġahiner, 2018;ġimĢek, 2018;UlaĢ, 2015;Yıldız, Çiftçi, Akar, & Sezer, 2015). On the other hand, in some studies students were able to use their procedural skills by applying the necessary rules and formulas on algebraic expressions and identities, but they could not explain these procedures conceptually (Baki & Kartal, 2004;Bekdemir, Okur, & Gelen, 2010;Karaaslan & Ay, 2017;Sarı, 2012). However, researchers detect that in learning environments where conceptual and procedural knowledge are supported and managed together, students can complete the tasks successfully, and permanent learning is achieved (Delice & Sevimli, 2010;Orhan, 2013;Örmeci, 2012;Rittle-Johnson, Siegler, & Alibali, 2001;Rittle-Johnson & Koedinger 2009;TaĢtepe, 2018;Yazır, 2015).…”
Section: The Subject Field Of Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Danişman & Tanışlı, 2017), in concepts of probability (ex. dependent probability, chance, sample space), which examine misconceptions and beliefs about probability (for example, Bursalı, & Gökkurt-Özdemir, 2019;Stohl, 2005), and which examines conceptual and procedural levels of knowledge about probability (e.g., Ata, 2014;Karaaslan & Ay, 2017;Kurt-Birel, 2017). A study to develop a test to measure teacher candidates' understanding of statistics and probability at a cognitive level is also a study that measures teacher candidates' statistical reasoning skills (Arican & Kuzu, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%