Abstract:Encouraging consumers to switch to lower-rate mortgages is important both for the individual consumer's finances and for functioning competitive markets, but switching rates are low. Given the complexity of mortgages, one potential regulatory intervention that may increase switching rates is to provide independent advice on how to select good mortgage products and how to navigate the switching process. Working with a government consumer protection agency, we conducted an experiment with mortgage-holders to tes… Show more
“…For example, Ashby and Teodorescu (2019) found that reducing the monetary costs of switching between alternatives reduced inertia biases in a binary choice setting. Similarly, reducing the costs of exploration between service providers, e.g., by enforcing transparency of prices and providing easy comparison tools, reduces information costs and tends to alleviate consumer’s inertia biases (e.g., see Timmons et al, 2019 ; Byrne et al, 2020 ; Marandola et al, 2020 ). In fact, encouraging switching between service providers by reducing the associated switching costs is generally understood as a major factor for improving consumer welfare ( BEREC, 2010 ; Ofcom, 2010 ; Marandola et al, 2020 ; Heiss et al, 2021 ).…”
Insufficient exploration of one’s surroundings is at the root of many real-life problems, as demonstrated by many famous biases (e.g., the status quo bias, learned helplessness). The current work focuses on the emergence of this phenomenon at the strategy level: the tendency to under-explore the set of available choice strategies. We demonstrate that insufficient exploration of strategies can also manifest as excessive exploration between options. In such cases, interventions aimed at improving choices by reducing the costs of exploration of options are likely to fail. In Study 1, participants faced an exploration task that implies an infinite number of choice strategies and a small sub-set of (near) optimal solutions. We manipulated the amount of practice participants underwent during the first, shorter game and compared their performance in a second, longer game with an identical payoff structure. Our results show that regardless of the amount of practice, participants in all experimental groups tended to under-explore the strategy space and relied on a specific strategy that implied over-exploration of the option space. That is, under-exploration of strategies was manifested as over-exploration of options. In Study 2, we added a constraint that, on a subset of practice trials, forced participants to exploit familiar options. This manipulation almost doubled the per-trial average outcome on the comparable longer second game. This suggests that forcing participants to experience the effects of different (underexplored) strategy components during practice can greatly increase the chance they make better choices later on.
“…For example, Ashby and Teodorescu (2019) found that reducing the monetary costs of switching between alternatives reduced inertia biases in a binary choice setting. Similarly, reducing the costs of exploration between service providers, e.g., by enforcing transparency of prices and providing easy comparison tools, reduces information costs and tends to alleviate consumer’s inertia biases (e.g., see Timmons et al, 2019 ; Byrne et al, 2020 ; Marandola et al, 2020 ). In fact, encouraging switching between service providers by reducing the associated switching costs is generally understood as a major factor for improving consumer welfare ( BEREC, 2010 ; Ofcom, 2010 ; Marandola et al, 2020 ; Heiss et al, 2021 ).…”
Insufficient exploration of one’s surroundings is at the root of many real-life problems, as demonstrated by many famous biases (e.g., the status quo bias, learned helplessness). The current work focuses on the emergence of this phenomenon at the strategy level: the tendency to under-explore the set of available choice strategies. We demonstrate that insufficient exploration of strategies can also manifest as excessive exploration between options. In such cases, interventions aimed at improving choices by reducing the costs of exploration of options are likely to fail. In Study 1, participants faced an exploration task that implies an infinite number of choice strategies and a small sub-set of (near) optimal solutions. We manipulated the amount of practice participants underwent during the first, shorter game and compared their performance in a second, longer game with an identical payoff structure. Our results show that regardless of the amount of practice, participants in all experimental groups tended to under-explore the strategy space and relied on a specific strategy that implied over-exploration of the option space. That is, under-exploration of strategies was manifested as over-exploration of options. In Study 2, we added a constraint that, on a subset of practice trials, forced participants to exploit familiar options. This manipulation almost doubled the per-trial average outcome on the comparable longer second game. This suggests that forcing participants to experience the effects of different (underexplored) strategy components during practice can greatly increase the chance they make better choices later on.
“…The vignette experiment reported here formed part of a larger study on attitudes to disability policy, with other stages reported in Timmons et al. (2023). The study was hosted online using Gorilla (Anwyl‐Irvine et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total sample size was determined based on the experimental task that required the most power (a list experiment reported in Timmons et al., 2023). The vignettes experiment was designed such that each version of the vignettes would be shown to at least 250 participants, chosen at random.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They first completed quota screening questions based on their age, gender, location and socio‐economic status. After completing the information and consent form, they completed a list experiment (reported in Timmons et al., 2023). They then began the part of the study reported here.…”
Existing research on prejudice and discrimination towards disabled people (i.e. ‘ableism’) has conceptualized it as a general attitude, obscuring the role of social context in its manifestation. We aimed to investigate whether and how ableism manifests differently depending on the nature of the disability, the disabled person's gender and the social context of the interaction. A nationally representative sample of 2000 adults read a series of vignettes about issues faced by disabled people (e.g. employment, relationships). Vignettes varied by presence and type of disability and the disabled person's gender. Judgements about how a disabled person was treated showed clear evidence of ableism towards some conditions (e.g. autism) but not others (e.g. a spine disorder). Judgements about the actions of a disabled person were more nuanced. A disability‐gender intersectionality effect was observed for judgements about romantic relationships, with physically disabled women penalized compared to men but no gender difference was observed for intellectual disability. No intersectionality or ableism was observed on a vignette about refusing poorly paid work. We find clear evidence that ableism manifests differently depending on the nature of the individual's disability, their gender and the social context, questioning previous conceptualizations of ableism as a general attitude.
“…Many consumers recognise their lack of knowledge and the complexity of the market, citing these as reasons not to engage in switching (Byrne et al, 2020a). The fear that many consumers have of making mistakes ties in with experimental evidence suggesting that consumers who have greater awareness of all that is involved in the mortgage switching process are more willing to switch (Timmons, Barjaková, McElvaney and Lunn, 2022). This is because those who perceive the switching costs more accurately and have a more representative perception of market conditions are also less likely to feel that they would make a mistake in their switching decision.…”
The mission of the Economic and Social Research Institute is to advance evidencebased policymaking that supports economic sustainability and social progress in Ireland. ESRI researchers apply the highest standards of academic excellence to challenges facing policymakers, focusing on 10 areas of critical importance to 21 st Century Ireland.The Institute was founded in 1960 by a group of senior civil servants led by Dr T.K. Whitaker, who identified the need for independent and in-depth research analysis to provide a robust evidence base for policymaking in Ireland.Since then, the Institute has remained committed to independent research and its work is free of any expressed ideology or political position. The Institute publishes all research reaching the appropriate academic standard, irrespective of its findings or who funds the research.The quality of its research output is guaranteed by a rigorous peer review process. ESRI researchers are experts in their fields and are committed to producing work that meets the highest academic standards and practices.The work of the Institute is disseminated widely in books, journal articles and reports. ESRI publications are available to download, free of charge, from its website. Additionally, ESRI staff communicate research findings at regular conferences and seminars.The ESRI is a company limited by guarantee, answerable to its members and governed by a Council, comprising 14 members who represent a cross-section of ESRI members from academia, civil services, state agencies, businesses and civil society. The Institute receives an annual grant-in-aid from the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform to support the scientific and public interest elements of the Institute's activities; the grant accounted for an average of 30 per cent of the Institute's income over the lifetime of the last Research Strategy. The remaining funding comes from research programmes supported by government departments and agencies, public bodies and competitive research programmes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.