2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence and spatial distribution of microplastics in the surface waters of the Baltic Sea and the Gulf of Riga

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in the easternmost part of the GOF, in the area we did not cover, the MP concentrations are probably higher than we observed due to the impact of river Neva (Martyanov et al, 2021). If we combine our results with Aigars et al (2021), a meridional pattern is revealed in the GOR: higher MP concentrations in the south and lower MP concentrations in the north. This could be related to the population in the catchment areas as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that in the easternmost part of the GOF, in the area we did not cover, the MP concentrations are probably higher than we observed due to the impact of river Neva (Martyanov et al, 2021). If we combine our results with Aigars et al (2021), a meridional pattern is revealed in the GOR: higher MP concentrations in the south and lower MP concentrations in the north. This could be related to the population in the catchment areas as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…High mean MP concentration was detected at offshore station 85. This is a somewhat controversial result as earlier studies have reported higher values near coasts and rather low values offshore in the BP (e.g., Aigars et al, 2021). No major rivers enter the area, or remarkable point sources (cities and towns) are nearby.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, in the same area, the type of polymers found at a depth of 40 cm can be different from those found at 15 cm depth (Lenaker et al, 2019). According to the reviewed studies, most of the polymers found onto the water surface and subsurface were PS (polystyrene), PE (polyethylene) and PP (polypropylene) (Frère et al, 2017;So et al, 2018;Aigars et al, 2021) Supplementary Tables S1, S2. These polymers have a density lower than 1 g/cm 3 , while PVC (polyvinyl chloride) or PET are more likely to be located deeper in the water column and in the bottom sediment due to their higher densities (Lenaker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Survey Of Microplastics In the Water Surface Affected By The...mentioning
confidence: 99%