1999
DOI: 10.1097/00004032-199904000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Doses From Radon in Spanish Spas

Abstract: Recent international recommendations have included exposure to natural radiation as one of the sources to monitor in certain occupationally exposed groups. Among those mentioned are workers in thermal spas, who may be exposed to high radiation doses due to the high concentration of radon in the indoor air of the spa. This paper presents the methodology and the results of an evaluation of radiation doses to the staff in different thermal spas in Spain. Different series of samples were collected and measurements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Values of F measured in treatment rooms of thermal spas in Slovenia and Austria range from 0.14 to 0.45 (Lettner et al., 1996; Vaupotič and Kobal, 2001). In two Spanish thermal spas, the estimated average F value was 0.6 (Soto and Gómez, 1999).…”
Section: Annex a Aerosol Data And Dose Coefficients For Radon Progenymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Values of F measured in treatment rooms of thermal spas in Slovenia and Austria range from 0.14 to 0.45 (Lettner et al., 1996; Vaupotič and Kobal, 2001). In two Spanish thermal spas, the estimated average F value was 0.6 (Soto and Gómez, 1999).…”
Section: Annex a Aerosol Data And Dose Coefficients For Radon Progenymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Vaupotic and Kobal (2001) reported very higher concentrations in a swimming pool at Radenci Slovenia. Wider ranges are reported by others (Andrzej Przylibski, 2000;Horvath et al, 2000;Soto et al, 1995;Soto and Gomez, 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Using a DCF factor of 1.43 Sv/J h m −3 , the estimated effective doses were found to range between 1 and 44 mSv year −1 . This upper limit is higher than the recommended annual limit of 20 mSv year −1 for the occupational dose ( 45 ). 1 L ground water samples were selected from more than 500 water supply facilities.…”
Section: Dosementioning
confidence: 60%