1998
DOI: 10.1108/eb022538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obtaining repeatability of natural extended upper body positions: Its use in comparisons of the functional comfort of garments

Abstract: This paper describes research undertaken at the Nottingham Trent University which investigated body movements and their relationship to garment design. The study identifies the difference between ergonomic measuring positions and the natural postures used by real figures in real activities. A new approach to the identification and coding of upper body postures has been made. A body coding system and a simple piece of equipment was designed that enables extended natural body positions to be recorded, thus achie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, the garment should maintain the wearing comfort and fulfil the space demand of the bent joint in various postures as it is in the standing straight posture and still help to achieve the desired level of comfort and the needed protection against external hazards. Nevertheless, the body dimensions change with a posture change (Aldrich 1998;Lee and Ashdown 2005;Choi and Ashdown 2011) and the garment needs to drape to allow room for the body in the changed posture. In some cases, the clothing can restrict the mobility of the body (Dorman and Havenith 2009) or even further change the body shape by a compression (Pheasant 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the garment should maintain the wearing comfort and fulfil the space demand of the bent joint in various postures as it is in the standing straight posture and still help to achieve the desired level of comfort and the needed protection against external hazards. Nevertheless, the body dimensions change with a posture change (Aldrich 1998;Lee and Ashdown 2005;Choi and Ashdown 2011) and the garment needs to drape to allow room for the body in the changed posture. In some cases, the clothing can restrict the mobility of the body (Dorman and Havenith 2009) or even further change the body shape by a compression (Pheasant 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most garment distortions happen due to the active movements of the upper body, such as shoulder movements, arm extension, and elbow diameter change 46,50 . According to Hatch, the typical stretchability range of textiles for a tailored garment is 15-25%, for sportswear is 20-35%, and for a form-fit compression garment is between 30-40% 51,52 . Based on these ranges, we expect our E-TeCS to withstand a strain of up to 30%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D scanning allows the capture of the body in static functional postures, which has been done in previous studies [2,4,10,13], to determine functional ease requirements for pattern development. However, there are limitations to the accuracy of the results if the intention is to replicate movement [10,11,14,15]. As the body moves into and holds the static, functional postures, the body tenses muscles that may not necessarily be utilized when the body in performing the natural movement [11].…”
Section: Motion Centred Designmentioning
confidence: 99%