2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2032144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of a Transition From Inverse-Spin-Switch to Spin-Switch Behavior in Domain State of a Py/Nb/Py Trilayer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies showing both positive and negative values of ∆R are explained on the basis of stray magnetic fields or vortex flow from a multi-domain state of one or both coupled F layers [14,29]. In our spin-valves positive ∆R is expected due to QP GMR, and a multidomain state with out-of-plane stray magnetic fields is unlikely since the antiferromagnetic FeMn ensures clear stable Pand AP-states above and below T c (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies showing both positive and negative values of ∆R are explained on the basis of stray magnetic fields or vortex flow from a multi-domain state of one or both coupled F layers [14,29]. In our spin-valves positive ∆R is expected due to QP GMR, and a multidomain state with out-of-plane stray magnetic fields is unlikely since the antiferromagnetic FeMn ensures clear stable Pand AP-states above and below T c (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 49%
“…We note that ∆T c values of several hundred mK have been reported with rare-earth ferromagnetic metals and insulators [19][20][21]. Negative ∆T c values have also been reported [14,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] due to quasiparticle (QP) spin-accumulation [23,26,28] suppressing T c in the AP-state [31,32], or flux penetration in S from out-of-plane domain walls in the F layers [14,24,27,30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[49][50][51][52][53][54] In some cases tuning the systems parameters leads to switching from standard to inverse spin-valve effect in resistance measurements. 55,56 All suggested explanations of the inverse spin-valve effect in F 1 /S/F 2 trilayers lay beyond the described proximity effect theory. The authors of Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular while in systems including relatively weak ferromagnets such as CuNi alloy, the standard switching effect predicted by the theory 18 was observed, 15,16,19 some experiments with strong ferromagnetic materials have shown either the standard switching effect, 6,20 the inverse one, 7 or both. 5,21 As pointed out in Ref. 22, the spin-valve effect is measured at temperatures close to the critical temperature where superconducting properties are still weak, and the influence of magnetic inhomogeneity, in particular from domains and DWs, should be taken into account for a quantitative description of the effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%