O modelo literário humanista e a legitimação do pintor artista na França do século XVII

Mello, Celina Maria Moreira de

doi:10.18309/anp.v1i12.503

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As far as linguistic classifications are concerned, the internal relations of the TG branch of the Tupı ´an family have received much scholarly attention, with different approaches employed to establish them from linguistic data alone. Phonological criteria have been put to use alongside grammatical properties and lexical cognacy, both in "traditional" [7][8][9][10][11][12] and "quantitative" approaches [13][14][15][16][17]. Although these studies agree to a large extent on the topology of the shallower splits, there are still irreconcilable differences in terms of the deepest ones, and much disagreement about their dating.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous studies using reduced datasets not designed for phylogenetic analysis [8][9][10] are still the most commonly referenced ones. The otherwise thorough studies by [11,12] contained errors in the data that may have influenced the results. [15] is the first Bayesian phylogenetic classification, but neither the underlying data nor the model are public.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lexical phylogenetics of the Tupí-Guaraní family: Language, archaeology, and the problem of chronology

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tupí-Guaraní is one of the largest branches of the Tupían language family, but despite its relevance there is no consensus about its origins in terms of age, homeland, and expansion. Linguistic classifications vary significantly, with archaeological studies suggesting incompatible date ranges while ethnographic literature confirms the close similarities as a result of continuous inter-family contact. To investigate this issue, we use a linguistic database of cognate data, employing Bayesian phylogenetic methods to infer a dated tree and to build a phylogeographic expansion model. Results suggest that the branch originated around 2500 BP in the area of the upper course of the Tapajós-Xingu basins, with a split between Southern and Northern varieties beginning around 1750 BP. We analyse the difficulties in reconciling archaeological and linguistic data for this group, stressing the importance of developing an interdisciplinary unified model that incorporates evidence from both disciplines.

show abstract