2017
DOI: 10.5902/1980509830313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O Microclima De Diferentes Arranjos Paisagísticos Na Arborização De Ruas De Curitiba - Pr

Abstract: Microclimate improvement is frequently stated as one of the benefits generated by urban forestry. However, there are still few studies that quantitatively approach this issue. The goal of this study was to quantify the microclimatic difference between streets with and without trees, for each season and landscaping type. For this, three locations were chosen. Each location showed different species composing landscaping types: Tipuana tipu, Handroanthus chrysotrichus, and Lafoensia pacari with Parapiptadenia rig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate the importance of studies that involve different arrangements and clones regarding integrated systems. Therefore, more studies are required, such as the methodologies that evaluate the microclimate (MARTINI et al, 2017), the temperature variation (LEAL et al, 2016), the emission of greenhouse gas (TOSATO; PELISSARI, 2017), the biomass increase (SEGER et al, 2016) and morphometrics (SANTOS et al, 2014;BOBROWSKI et al, 2017) as a way of providing information to correct and work around the aggravating effects of inappropriate agricultural practices and respective global warming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results demonstrate the importance of studies that involve different arrangements and clones regarding integrated systems. Therefore, more studies are required, such as the methodologies that evaluate the microclimate (MARTINI et al, 2017), the temperature variation (LEAL et al, 2016), the emission of greenhouse gas (TOSATO; PELISSARI, 2017), the biomass increase (SEGER et al, 2016) and morphometrics (SANTOS et al, 2014;BOBROWSKI et al, 2017) as a way of providing information to correct and work around the aggravating effects of inappropriate agricultural practices and respective global warming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%