2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470514962.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Influences in Early Life upon Obesity and Body Proportions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Specific nutritional deficiencies, possibly secondary to maternal under nutrition, could also render the fetus unable to lay down lean tissue mass, so energy becomes deposited as fat. 17 One of the interesting observation of the present study was contribution of genetic factors to the prevalence of 'thinfat' phenotype. This statement we make because, consanguinity was significantly associated with this phenotype (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…16 Specific nutritional deficiencies, possibly secondary to maternal under nutrition, could also render the fetus unable to lay down lean tissue mass, so energy becomes deposited as fat. 17 One of the interesting observation of the present study was contribution of genetic factors to the prevalence of 'thinfat' phenotype. This statement we make because, consanguinity was significantly associated with this phenotype (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The availability of nutrients at different times during gestation, by interacting with the maternal and fetal hormonal profile, predisposes to different patterns of growth (Jackson et al, 1996). These relationships between the organ size and the function underscore one of the basic biologic compensatory properties: inherent ability to increase or decrease mass (hypertrophy or atrophy) and to alter tissue configuration in direct relationship to functional requirements (Kenchaiah and Pfeffer, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williamson (151) studied a nationally representative cohort of smokers and nonsmokers in the USA (1971)(1972)(1973)(1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984) and found that the mean weight gain attributable to smoking cessation was 2.8kg in men and 3.8kg in (136)(137)(138).…”
Section: Smoking Cessationmentioning
confidence: 99%