2015
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2014.897992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Studies on Smoke Spread in the Cavity of a Double-Skin Façade

Abstract: Sun (2015): Numerical studies on smoke spread in the cavity of a double-skin façade, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Abstract. In this paper, influence of two key factors, fire room height and outer pane tilt angle, on smoke spread in the cavity of a double-skin façade (DSF) was studied numerically. The fire room was located adjacent to the DSF on the 2 nd , 4 th and 6 th floors, respectively. The outer pane tilt angle varied at 80°, 90° and 100°. All cases were under two fire heat release rates o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Q is the heat release rate (kW), T is the temperature (K), The model scale should be larger than 0.3 m to meet the applying requirement of the Froude model. [29][30][31] The cubic model is common and widely used in the study of projecting flame from a compartment, for the temperature in a cubic model would be more likely to be homogeneous after the flashover breaks out. 7,8,[17][18][19] In this study, the dimensions of the 1:3th scale fire room model is 1.0 m…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Q is the heat release rate (kW), T is the temperature (K), The model scale should be larger than 0.3 m to meet the applying requirement of the Froude model. [29][30][31] The cubic model is common and widely used in the study of projecting flame from a compartment, for the temperature in a cubic model would be more likely to be homogeneous after the flashover breaks out. 7,8,[17][18][19] In this study, the dimensions of the 1:3th scale fire room model is 1.0 m…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model scale should be larger than 0.3 m to meet the applying requirement of the Froude model . The cubic model is common and widely used in the study of projecting flame from a compartment, for the temperature in a cubic model would be more likely to be homogeneous after the flashover breaks out .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0 0 1 [ C°I t has also been proven with several experiments that the temperature differences required for glass pane cracking will increase with increasing thickness [28]. The type of glass pane selection, such as single pane/double pane, also has a significant effect on the glass fire performance [28,104,105]. Besides, the smoke movement [98], glass pane orientation [28,30,99], and location of the fire [30] are found to be of considerable significance for glass pane breakage [14].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The The bulk of research into smoke spread in MURBs focuses on airflow in vertical shafts (usually elevator shafts and stairwells). [110][111][112][113][114] Elevator shafts provide no resistance to airflow, and the absolute temperature difference between the smoke in the shafts and ambient conditions can vary by as much as a factor of three, resulting in the potential for very large stack-driven pressures. Large stackdriven airflows are also possible in stairwells, though the mechanism of smoke spread is more complex, due to the confining features of treads and side walls.…”
Section: Smoke Compartmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulk of research into smoke spread in MURBs focuses on airflow in vertical shafts (usually elevator shafts and stairwells) 110‐114 . Elevator shafts provide no resistance to airflow, and the absolute temperature difference between the smoke in the shafts and ambient conditions can vary by as much as a factor of three, resulting in the potential for very large stack‐driven pressures.…”
Section: Relevance To Indoor Environmental Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%