Numerical simulations of rear point-contacted solar cells on 2.2 Ωcm p-type c-Si substrates

Abstract

Rear surface of high‐efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells is based on a combination of dielectric passivation and point‐like contacts. In this work, we develop a 3D model for these devices based on 2.2 Ωcm p‐type crystalline silicon substrates. We validate the model by comparison with experimental results allowing us to determine an optimum design for the rear pattern. Additionally, the 3D model results are compared with the ones deduced from a simpler and widely used 1D model. Although the maximum efficiency predicted by both models is approximately the same, large deviations are observed in open‐circuit voltage and fill factor. 1D simulations overestimate open‐circuit voltage because Dember and electrochemical potential drops are not taken into account. On the contrary, fill factor is underestimated because of higher ohmic losses along the base when 1D analytical model is used. These deviations are larger for relatively low‐doped substrates, as the ones used in the experimental samples reported hereby, and poor passivated contacts. As a result, 1D models could mislead to too short optimum rear contact spacing. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

3D TCAD modeling of laser processed c-Si solar cells

“…For an optimized design the optimum pitch must evolve with the passivation of the contacts and an accurate model of the device is crucial in this task. For example, in [11] our 3D model is compared to simpler and widely used 1D approach. 1D model tend to overestimate V oc for devices with and leading to lower FF values.…”

Analysis of the EWT-DGB solar cell at low and medium concentration and comparison with a PESC architecture

“…The electro‐optical device simulations adopt up‐to‐date physical and electrical models (including doping and carrier density dependence of mobility, band‐gap narrowing, Auger and trap‐assisted recombination) reported in , and successfully used in relevant simulation studies , . The optical simulation has been performed by means of raytracing accounting for an antireflection coating (ARC) layer consisting of a 105‐nm‐thick silicon dioxide layer.…”

High‐efficiency black silicon interdigitated back contacted solar cells on p‐type and n‐type c‐Si substrates

“…Therefore, there are no inversion or accumulation layers below passivated surfaces; and (x) physical models-for example. carrier statistics, band gap narrowing, and carrier mobilities-are the same as considered in [27]. xi) Ohmic losses related to the backside metallization grid (fingers and busbars) are modeled by a lumped series resistance (R s ) in Ω units whose value is …”