Volume 7: Ocean Engineering 2016
DOI: 10.1115/omae2016-54851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modelling of Floating and Submerged Bridges Subjected to Wave, Current and Wind

Abstract: We employed maturely developed methods and software, RIFLEX/SIMO/SIMA to look into the feasibilities of different floating tunnel/bridge design concepts. The global hydroelastic responses of two concepts, i.e. tether/pontoon supported hybrid tunnel concept and floating foundation supported girder concept and have been investigated. The distributions of maximum values of the deflection, bending moment and stress along the bridges under different sea conditions are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is mainly focusing on the validation and feasibility of the newly developed methods. The inhomogeneous waves used are measured data from another fjord in Norway [19], not specifically for the current floating bridge site. Regarding the effect of the inhomogeneity of the waves, further studies need to be carried out to make more general conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is mainly focusing on the validation and feasibility of the newly developed methods. The inhomogeneous waves used are measured data from another fjord in Norway [19], not specifically for the current floating bridge site. Regarding the effect of the inhomogeneity of the waves, further studies need to be carried out to make more general conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of a floating bridge supported by discrete pontoons has been proposed in Norway. Overall bridge model is shown in Fig.2, which has been proposed by Lie et al, [2]. All pontoons and connecting girders have been numbered as P1, B0 to P12, B12 from the left side to right, respectively.…”
Section: Floating Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the large water depth (more than 500 meters), the surface crossing concept will greatly decrease the cost of this project, compared with the underwater floating tunnel concept. One of the concepts of floating bridge crossing Masfjorden was studied by Lie et al [2], which is 700 meters long, with a water depth of 500 m.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to wave loads, wind loads and load effects on pontoon-type floating bridges are much less addressed in the literature. Lie et al [10] investigated the feasibility of deploying an end-anchored floating bridge in Masfjorden and compared its dynamic response with a submerged tube bridge concept. The wind, wave and current loads on the floating bridges were considered; however, the modeling of wind, wave and current loads were not well stated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%