2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of the large strain problem in the case of mushrooming projectiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the simulated crash scenario is a dynamic phenomenon in which the strain rate effect plays a significant role, the widely used Johnson–Cook (JC) constitutive model [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ] was implemented to model the behavior of the lighting pole. Specifically, the simplified version of the JC model (SJC) was adopted.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the simulated crash scenario is a dynamic phenomenon in which the strain rate effect plays a significant role, the widely used Johnson–Cook (JC) constitutive model [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ] was implemented to model the behavior of the lighting pole. Specifically, the simplified version of the JC model (SJC) was adopted.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the impact, the bullet is subjected to high velocities, inducing high strain rates in the material, and also large deformation as we can see on the tests carried out in [27]. Therefore, for the lead core a perfect plastic behavior is assumed and defined by Equation (22).…”
Section: Perfect Plastic Modified Model For Ballistic Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debido a la complejidad logística que supone la realización de un ensayo de impacto empleando munición real, se han empleado los resultados obtenidos por Kedzierski et al [125], donde dispara el proyectil a dos velocidades diferentes, (105 m/s y 363 m/s) contra una superficie rígida, analizando la deformación que experimenta el proyectil en cada instante de tiempo. 11.4 mm 11.5 mm t =0.45 ms Figura 6.4: Comparación de los resultados obtenidos con el modelo numérico con los resultados obtenidos por Kedzierski et al [125] Como se observa en la figura 6.4, el modelo numérico desarrollado muestra una buena corelacción con los resultdos experimentales obtenidos por Kedzierski et al [125], considerando el proyectil calibrado para futuras aplicaciones en impactos.…”
Section: Recubrimiento Latónunclassified