2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57304-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Linear Algebra: Theory and Applications

Abstract: of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These figures show that the optimal λ was found on the interval λ ∈ [0.46, 0.48] on all refined meshes. Then the AFEM computations were performed in the software package WavES [34] with β = 0.5 in (3.11) which allows to refine meshes locally at places where the inclusion was located; see Figures 4,5. In the transverse plane, Figure 4 compares the original reconstructions on the unrefined initial FEM mesh with that of AFEM on locally adapted meshes at each time step. One can see from these plots how the density of the mesh changes around the border of the target and how this change becomes more and more pronounced as the contrast grows bigger and bigger due to thermal changes of the target as time goes by.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These figures show that the optimal λ was found on the interval λ ∈ [0.46, 0.48] on all refined meshes. Then the AFEM computations were performed in the software package WavES [34] with β = 0.5 in (3.11) which allows to refine meshes locally at places where the inclusion was located; see Figures 4,5. In the transverse plane, Figure 4 compares the original reconstructions on the unrefined initial FEM mesh with that of AFEM on locally adapted meshes at each time step. One can see from these plots how the density of the mesh changes around the border of the target and how this change becomes more and more pronounced as the contrast grows bigger and bigger due to thermal changes of the target as time goes by.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the method of normal equations is the fastest method for solving the linear least-squares problems (LLSP), it is not as accurate as QR or SVD decompositions. For instance, the method of normal equations is applied to the solution of LLSP when the condition number of the matrix A is not large [5]. Alternatively, using SVD of the matrix A = UΣV T and substituting it into (2.6), one can obtain a much more robust solution for m as follows:…”
Section: Differential Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defining the discrete differential operator as A, and splitting it into the Hermitian, D, and skew-Hermitian, C, parts [23],…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the floating-point version, which uses the built-in HLS function for SVD computation. The second one is the fixed-point version, which uses the general two-sided Jacobi method for EVD computation [22,23]. The details of this method for computing EVD is shown in Algorithm 4.…”
Section: Code Description and Hardware Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%