2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of regional particle deposition in the upper airway of a standing male mannequin in calm air surroundings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 9 indicates the numerical results in this study are in good agreement with both reported data for particles smaller than 40 lm and matches Naseri's [49] data for particles larger than 40 lm.…”
Section: Verification For Particle Simulationsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 9 indicates the numerical results in this study are in good agreement with both reported data for particles smaller than 40 lm and matches Naseri's [49] data for particles larger than 40 lm.…”
Section: Verification For Particle Simulationsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…9. Aspiration ratio against particle size comparison between numerical results and reported experimental data by Hsu and Swift [48] and numerical data by Naseri and Abouali [49]. [50], and Schroeter et al [51].…”
Section: Verification For Particle Simulationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an expanded study would require inclusion of the effect of the entire lower respiratory system on airflow and particle transport, as well as the need to use the full nasal model. In a recent work [57], the authors studied the facial effect on the distribution and focusing of the inhaled particles at the nostril under a steady inhalation condition. Extension of the present unsteady simulation to include the facial effect and effect of the surrounding environment are left for a future study.…”
Section: Pre-operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nano range (d < 100 nm), nasal deposition monotonically decreased with increase of particle size and the current simulation agreed well with experimental data. Observed variations, within tolerance of accuracy, were due to the experimental scattering, geometry variation between inhalation subjects, and variation in particle inhalation profiles (far field versus nostril, [56]). Based on the simulation, nasal and laryngeal deposition, as a function of flow rate Q ( m 3 /s ) and particle diffusivity D ( m 2 /s ) were developed (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%