A combined experimental and numerical study on upper airway dosimetry of inhaled nanoparticles from an electrical discharge machine shop

Abstract

BackgroundsExposure to nanoparticles in the workplace is a health concern to occupational workers with increased risk of developing respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders. Based on animal inhalation study and human lung tumor risk extrapolation, current authoritative recommendations on exposure limits are either on total mass or number concentrations. Effects of particle size distribution and the implication to regional airway dosages are not elaborated.MethodsReal time production of particle concentration and size distribution in the range from 5.52 to 98.2 nm were recorded in a wire-cut electrical discharge machine shop (WEDM) during a typical working day. Under the realistic exposure condition, human inhalation simulations were performed in a physiologically realistic nasal and upper airway replica. The combined experimental and numerical study is the first to establish a realistic exposure condition, and under which, detailed dose metric studies can be performed. In addition to mass concentration guided exposure limit, inhalation risks to nano-pollutant were reexamined accounting for the actual particle size distribution and deposition statistics. Detailed dosimetries of the inhaled nano-pollutants in human nasal and upper airways with respect to particle number, mass and surface area were discussed, and empirical equations were developed.ResultsAn astonishing enhancement of human airway dosages were detected by current combined experimental and numerical study in the WEDM machine shop. Up to 33 folds in mass, 27 folds in surface area and 8 folds in number dosages were detected during working hours in comparison to the background dosimetry measured at midnight. The real time particle concentration measurement showed substantial emission of nano-pollutants by WEDM machining activity, and the combined experimental and numerical study provided extraordinary details on human inhalation dosimetry. It was found out that human inhalation dosimetry was extremely sensitive to real time particle concentration and size distribution. Averaged particle concentration over 24-h period will inevitably misrepresent the sensible information critical for realistic inhalation risk assessment.ConclusionsParticle size distribution carries very important information in determining human airway dosimetry. A pure number or mass concentration recommendation on the exposure limit at workplace is insufficient. A particle size distribution, together with the deposition equations, is critical to recognize the actual exposure risks. In addition, human airway dosimetry in number, mass and surface area varies significantly. A complete inhalation risk assessment requires the knowledge of toxicity mechanisms in response to each individual metric. Further improvements in these areas are needed.

Nanoparticles: An Experimental Study of Zinc Nanoparticles Toxicity on Marine Crustaceans. General Overview on the Health Implications in Humans

“…Lastly workers could be exposed during production and processing of products containing engineered NPs (57).…”

“…There have been reports that among workers exposed to NPs, the risk of developing respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological disorders is increased (57). NPs may also aggravate existing diseases, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchitis as well as may increase inflammation and change lung function even at low engineered NPs exposure (11,52).…”

Numerical assessment of ambient inhaled micron particle deposition in a human nasal cavity

“…The hemisphere was located outside the breathing region that proposed by Shang et al (2015b) to minimise the influence of near-nostril biased airflow pattern on particle trajectories. This releasing condition has been widely adopted by previous published studies (Tian et al, 2017a(Tian et al, , 2017b(Tian et al, , 2019Dong et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2018). For each particle size, 100,000 particles were passively released to ensure particle number independent results.…”

A Review of Respiratory Anatomical Development, Air Flow Characterization and Particle Deposition

“…A variety of studies [45,58,106] has been conducted to predict the aerosol particle deposition in the extrathoracic region of the human lung using idealized anatomical models of circular or elliptic or constant diameter [107,108]. Recently, realistic CT/MRI based [109][110][111] anatomical models have been used to predict the local deposition in the extrathoracic airways. Xi and Longest [62] conducted a comparative study for local deposition in the mouth throat to larynx for different anatomical (realistic, circular, elliptic, fixed diameter) models and concluded that the CT-based realistic model provided the most accurate prediction of the experimental measurements.…”