2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical assessment of dependence of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance on cathode catalyst layer parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness the catalyst layers have been shown experimentally [10,11,12,13,14,15] and theoretically [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] to be decisive in determining the performance of the layers. From the data of Wilson and Gottesfeld [24] a thickness of around 4 µm appears to strike an optimum compromise in terms of catalyst utilization and performance for catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness the catalyst layers have been shown experimentally [10,11,12,13,14,15] and theoretically [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] to be decisive in determining the performance of the layers. From the data of Wilson and Gottesfeld [24] a thickness of around 4 µm appears to strike an optimum compromise in terms of catalyst utilization and performance for catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxygen transport resistance in the agglomerate is a function of these parameters. 12 However, a wide range of agglomerate sizes from 100 nm to 2000 nm, and ionomer thicknesses from 10 nm to 100 nm, had to be assumed in the literature [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] as fitting parameters in order to match their experimental data. Such large and random agglomerate size and thick ionomer film were not supported by microscopy observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, enlarging the channel/rib width ratio enhances the cell performance because of an increase in the reaction area of the oxygen with the cathode catalyst layer and an increase in the amount of water at both the anode and cathode. Obut and Alper [37] presented a three-dimensional, non-isothermal and two-phase numerical model in a straight flow field channel to investigate the influence of cathode catalyst layer parameters such as catalyst layer thickness, ionomer film thickness, agglomerate size and porosity on the performance of a PEM fuel cell. Their results revealed how these catalyst layer parameters influence diffusion coefficients, electrical, and proton conductivities, and effectiveness factor determines the area specific power density and mass specific power density of the PEM fuel cell separately.…”
Section: Catalyst Layer Structure Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%