2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of the scavenge flow and convective heat transfer in large two-stroke marine diesel engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat transfer from the cylinder to the cooling water was modeled as a combined convection-radiation type, Equation (5). Previous investigations [40] demonstrated the accuracy of this type of boundary condition in comparison with adiabatic or constant temperature:…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The heat transfer from the cylinder to the cooling water was modeled as a combined convection-radiation type, Equation (5). Previous investigations [40] demonstrated the accuracy of this type of boundary condition in comparison with adiabatic or constant temperature:…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Lamas [12] adopted 7S50MC scavenging pressure test data of MAN B&W and compared with the calculation results of ANSYS FLUENT, and good results are obtained. While Sigurdsson [13] compared the test data about the test model 4T50ME-X of MAN B&W with predicted results of Star CD, pressure error on the check point is 14%.While changing the equation of state to real gas state equation model, pressure error on the check point is still up 6.5%.…”
Section: Advances In Engineering Research Volume 119mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One with approximately 150,000 cells denoted "coarse" and one with approximately 237,000 cells denoted "medium". The reference mesh of 304,000 cells is referred to as "fine" [27]. The effect of mesh resolution is presented by comparing the radial profiles of the tangential velocity as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%