2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.01.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel optimization method for production strategy of coal-bed methane well: Implication from gas-water two-phase version productivity equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Typical BHP drop in the practice and (b) corresponding production performance. [Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2019 Elsevier].…”
Section: Current Practices In Dewatering Rate Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) Typical BHP drop in the practice and (b) corresponding production performance. [Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2019 Elsevier].…”
Section: Current Practices In Dewatering Rate Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, Sun et al proposed to optimize the dewatering strategy using gas–water pseudopressure equations, as shown below …”
Section: Current Practices In Dewatering Rate Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depressurization scheme has a great influence on the production of CBM wells. 54 The greater the depressurization rate, the easier it is for hydraulic fracturing to close. 55,56 Based on this, we argue that the depressurization rate is correlated with the stress sensitivity of hydraulic fracturing area.…”
Section: Potential Research Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the characteristics of fracture cavity filling (Hu et al 2014), the physical properties of fracture cavity filling materials, the degree of this map and its origin and distribution (Wang 2017;Kangxun 2014b;Jin et al 2015d) act as indispensable parts of the research on fracture cavity characteristics. Reservoir connectivity (Song et al 2013;Li et al 2014b;Hu and Yang 2005;Yang 2004;Sun et al 2019e;Yi et al 2011), fracture cavity separation (Rong et al 2015), and reservoir separation (Li 2016) reflect the distribution characteristics of fracture cavity reservoir space from different perspectives. Reservoir modeling (Yan et al 2013;Zhang et al 2007b) and numerical simulation (Hu et al 2013) give the results of fracture cavity distribution in the sense of mathematical modeling.…”
Section: Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%