2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel methods of molecular sex identification from skeletal tissue using the amelogenin gene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus assessing sex-specific demographic data such as age and stature while allowing one to better understand the gender-specific roles in a society [9] . The analysis of ancient DNA has the potential to provide answers to archaeological, paleontological and anthropological questions that classical approaches of these disciplines cannot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus assessing sex-specific demographic data such as age and stature while allowing one to better understand the gender-specific roles in a society [9] . The analysis of ancient DNA has the potential to provide answers to archaeological, paleontological and anthropological questions that classical approaches of these disciplines cannot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Johannesburg, South Africa, Gibbon et al 45 designed two novel methods of molecular sex identification from 30 skeletal tissues, using amelogenin gene. The classification of sex using the first system was determined by analysing the sequence for 10 sex-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to determine whether both the X and Y (male) or only the X (female) was represented.…”
Section: Mays and Faermanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of sex using the first system was determined by analysing the sequence for 10 sex-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to determine whether both the X and Y (male) or only the X (female) was represented. System two spans an indel (6 bp) in addition to 10 sex-specific SNP 45 . Using both systems of sex identification 14 (46.66%) specimens produced results, and of these 12 (85.71%) were males and 2 (14.28%) were females.…”
Section: Mays and Faermanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As rare animals are arduous to capture (Statham et al., 2007) and observe (Ortega, Franco, Adams, Ralls, & Maldonado, 2004), it is important to develop sexing techniques that can be performed on highly degraded noninvasive samples such as feces and hair. The same goes for analysis of ancient remains, such as juvenile skeletons that cannot be sexed anatomically (Gibbon, Paximadis, Strkalj, Ruff, & Penny, 2009), or forensic samples. When using such materials, there is higher risk for false negatives and contamination (Pages et al., 2009); therefore, the amplicon should be as short as possible (Statham et al., 2007) (maximally 200–250 bp) (Pages et al., 2009) and species specific (Esteve Codina, Niederstatter, & Parson, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%