2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel EDTA and process water recycling method after soil washing of multi-metal contaminated soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The EDTA is the most commonly used chelant because it has a strong chelating ability for cationic heavy metals, EDTA leaching can be used to treat a broad range of soil types, and the EDTA is recoverable (Dermont et al, 2008). A number of previous studies have investigated the optimum operational parameters of soil washing with EDTA, including dosage, washing cycle, post-wash rinses (Andrade et al, 2007), regeneration of EDTA leachate (Di Palma et al, 2005;Lo and Zhang, 2005;Finzgar and Lestan, 2008;Cesaro and Esposito, 2009), and EDTA degradation (Finzgar and Lestan, 2008;Pociecha and Lestan, 2012;Voglar and Lestan, 2012a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDTA is the most commonly used chelant because it has a strong chelating ability for cationic heavy metals, EDTA leaching can be used to treat a broad range of soil types, and the EDTA is recoverable (Dermont et al, 2008). A number of previous studies have investigated the optimum operational parameters of soil washing with EDTA, including dosage, washing cycle, post-wash rinses (Andrade et al, 2007), regeneration of EDTA leachate (Di Palma et al, 2005;Lo and Zhang, 2005;Finzgar and Lestan, 2008;Cesaro and Esposito, 2009), and EDTA degradation (Finzgar and Lestan, 2008;Pociecha and Lestan, 2012;Voglar and Lestan, 2012a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…다 (Dermont et al, 2008;Zeng et al, 2005 (Gyliene et al, 2004;Lim et al, 2005;Lim and Kim, 2013;Lo and Zhang, 2005;Di Palma et al, 2005;Pociecha and Lestan, 2010, 2012a, 2012bPociecha et al, 2011, Voglar andZeng et al, 2005 (Fig. 1a), Ni (Fig.…”
Section: 서 론mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Currently the EAOP is employed as the last stage of remediation to break down persistent contaminants [30,73,77]. The possible reasons for this include: (i) its powerful degradation capacity for POPs; (ii) its high cost; and (iii) electrode shelf life through fouling of the surface by heavily polluted samples.…”
Section: Combination With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%