The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2006.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel dielectrics for gate oxides and surface passivation on GaN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparing gate and passivation oxides on GaN surfaces remains an important challenge, and provides a context in which the value of a smooth CaO morphology can be estimated 40 . The CaO capacitors have a constant dielectric thickness of 4.5 nm and a Dy 2 O 3 cap thickness of 0.8 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparing gate and passivation oxides on GaN surfaces remains an important challenge, and provides a context in which the value of a smooth CaO morphology can be estimated 40 . The CaO capacitors have a constant dielectric thickness of 4.5 nm and a Dy 2 O 3 cap thickness of 0.8 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MgO and CaO are immiscible with each other below 2000 °C, previous reports , have shown that Mg x Ca 1– x O can be grown by MBE at lower temperature without phase separation. In order to examine the microscopic crystallinity and phase composition of the Mg x Ca 1– x O films deposited by this ALD method, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Relative to the vast wet chemical reaction sequences available for group IV semiconductor surfaces, there are comparatively few established wet chemical methodologies for modifying the native surfaces of GaAs and GaN. The most effective and most common type of wet chemical reactions for functionalizing GaAs and GaN surfaces involves immersion in solutions with sulfur-containing reagents (e.g., Na 2 S or alkanethiols), affecting the observable wetting properties, the surface energetics (i.e., the conduction and valence band edge electrochemical potentials), and/or surface charge trap density. Although a comprehensive analysis of thiol/sulfide treatments is outside the scope of this report, the main conclusions to be drawn from decades of research are that these wet chemical strategies were not designed from a detailed molecular-level understanding of surface reactivity and are accordingly not adequate in many optoelectronic applications. For example, thiol-based treatments are inferior to epitaxial surface capping layers (e.g., Al x Ga 1– x As, SiN x ) for ameliorating surface defects long-term. To determine whether any wet chemical strategy for III–V surfaces can supplant costly and complex solid-state surface treatments, better insight on the wet chemical reactivity of these semiconductor interfaces is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%