1993
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5877(93)90116-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes about determining the cut-off value in enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 This was the mean difference between LSA wells minus medium alone wells plus 2 SD. 22 Stimulation with PHA was used as a positive control. PHA proliferation values between 1.12 and 1.55 optical densities (95% confidence interval) for the mean difference between PHA and medium alone were considered positive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This was the mean difference between LSA wells minus medium alone wells plus 2 SD. 22 Stimulation with PHA was used as a positive control. PHA proliferation values between 1.12 and 1.55 optical densities (95% confidence interval) for the mean difference between PHA and medium alone were considered positive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Thus, serology has been proposed as a monitoring tool, indicating exposure to Salmonella during production, while bacteriological testing is a way to confirm and locate a current infection. 15 To implement a surveillance program, the cutoff point of the ELISA must be continually assessed and adapted to the test purposes, allowing adjustments in sensitivity and specificity, 4 and it should also be adapted according to the development of the Salmonella control program in which it is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 This serovar shares at least 2 LPS antigens with other highly prevalent serovars isolated in this region (Salmonella Agona, Salmonella Derby, Salmonella Bredeney, and Salmonella Panama). The aim of this study was to develop an in-house ELISA test based on the LPS of S. Typhimurium (O: 1,4,5,12) and to evaluate the new test in infected herds in southern Brazil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iELISA cutoff point was determined by assessing the range between positive and negative samples. Other more empirical methods have been used to set positive-negative cutoff values (2,6,9). Conventional statistical methods for cutoff determination are not applicable given the relatively small number of positive samples available for assay analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%