1994
DOI: 10.2307/3325097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Not like Us": Removing the Barriers to Recruiting Minority Faculty

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the pool for a position has been developed, and candidates have advanced into the interview stage, interventions in this frame focus on how the on-campus interview process can be structured to be culturally responsive while simultaneously increasing the likelihood that a candidate accepts an offer. This includes giving URG candidates opportunities to connect with other faculty and staff on campus who might share similar identities and experiences (Tierney & Bensimon, 1996), to meet with students, especially activists, who might provide honest assessments of the campus culture and environment for URG community members (Sensoy & DiAngelo, 2017), and to provide connections to community leaders and people who may be relevant to their work and life beyond the institution to foster a sense of comfort and connection (Light, 1994).…”
Section: On-campus Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the pool for a position has been developed, and candidates have advanced into the interview stage, interventions in this frame focus on how the on-campus interview process can be structured to be culturally responsive while simultaneously increasing the likelihood that a candidate accepts an offer. This includes giving URG candidates opportunities to connect with other faculty and staff on campus who might share similar identities and experiences (Tierney & Bensimon, 1996), to meet with students, especially activists, who might provide honest assessments of the campus culture and environment for URG community members (Sensoy & DiAngelo, 2017), and to provide connections to community leaders and people who may be relevant to their work and life beyond the institution to foster a sense of comfort and connection (Light, 1994).…”
Section: On-campus Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher education is one of the U.S. social institutions most insistently expressing concern about minority recruitment, retention, and advancement (Agrawal, Vlaicu, and Carrasquillo, 2005;Alon, 2009). Most of the research focuses on hiring faculty members and shows a strong consensus that minorities continue to be underrepresented in virtually every discipline and field of higher education (Light, 1994;Astin et al, 1997;Turner and Meyers, 2000;Aguirre, 2000;Harvey, 2001).…”
Section: Minority Hiring In Higher Education: the "Pipeline" Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are quite a few studies, articles, and presentations that have addressed the issue of faculty diversity (or lack thereof) in higher education (Buttner, Lowe, & Billings-Harris, 2007;Chen & Yang, 2013;Gater, 2005;Lee, 2010;Levsen, Goettel, Chong, & Farris, 2001;Light, 1994;Lindsay, 1999;Lynch, 2013;Minor, 2013;Roy, 2013;Stanley, 2006;Turner, Gonzalez, & Wood, 2008;Weinberg, 2008), there are only a handful of studies which have focused specifically on diversity among business school faculty (Buttner et al, 2007;Moskowitz, 1994;The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 2002). Moskowitz (1994) and the The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education focused only on Black faculty.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%