Not all risks are created equal: A twin study and meta-analyses of risk taking across seven domains.

Abstract

Humans routinely deal with both traditional and novel risks. Different kinds of risks have been a driving force for both evolutionary adaptations and personal development. This study explored the genetic and environmental influences on human risk taking in different task domains. Our approach was threefold. First, we integrated several scales of domain-specific risk-taking propensity and developed a synthetic scale, including both evolutionarily typical and modern risks in the following 7 domains: cooperation/competition, safety, reproduction, natural/physical risk, moral risk, financial risk, and gambling. Second, we conducted a twin study using the scale to estimate the contributions of genes and environment to risk taking in each of these 7 domains. Third, we conducted a series of meta-analyses of extant twin studies across the 7 risk domains. The results showed that individual differences in risk-taking propensity and its consistency across domains were mainly regulated by additive genetic influences and individually unique environmental experiences. The heritability estimates from the meta-analyses ranged from 29% in financial risk taking to 55% in safety. Supporting the notion of risk-domain specificity, both the behavioral and genetic correlations among the 7 domains were generally low. Among the relatively few correlations between pairs of risk domains, our analysis revealed a common genetic factor that regulates moral, financial, and natural/physical risk taking. This is the first effort to separate genetic and environmental influences on risk taking across multiple domains in a single study and integrate the findings of extant twin studies via a series of meta-analyses conducted in different task domains. (PsycINFO Database Record

Mechanisms underlying familial aggregation of exceptional health and survival: A three‐generation cohort study

“…Behavior is influenced by a complex set of bio‐psycho‐social and cultural factors. Risk‐taking and personality traits like extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness as well as behaviors such as smoking are known to have substantial genetic contribution to their variation in very diverse populations (Bouchard & McGue, 2003; Saccone et al, 2007; Wang, Zheng, Xuan, Chen, & Li, 2016) and, moreover, to be associated with survival (Jokela et al, 2013; Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi, & Goldberg, 2007). Similarly, childhood rearing environment including role models is associated with later adult behaviors (Kendler, Ohlsson, Sundquist, & Sundquist, 2018).…”

The psychological typhoon eye effect in responses to terrorism

“…Will the PTE effect detected in the context of man-made hazards share a domain-general mechanism with the PTE effect detected in the context of natural hazards? Or is the underlying mechanism for these two effects domain-specific, as suggested by Wang, Zheng, Xuan, Chen, and Li (2016)?…”

Interpersonal Insecurity and Risk-Taking Propensity Across Domains and Around the Globe

“…First, this scale captures not only modern risks but also evolutionarily typical risks by integrating multiple domainspecific risk-taking scales (e.g., Kruger et al, 2007;Weber et al, 2002). Second, samples in the present study and in Wang et al (2016) were Chinese, eliminating potential cultural differences in understanding items.…”