2016
DOI: 10.4103/1115-3474.187970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative measurements of the ocular globe position in relation to interzygomatic line, using magnetic resonance imaging among adults in Zaria, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
8
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The normal interzygomatic distance lies between 90 mm and 109 mm. [82223] These values are similar to those noted in our population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The normal interzygomatic distance lies between 90 mm and 109 mm. [82223] These values are similar to those noted in our population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[8] Values measured by other authors vary from 6.5 mm in a Nigerian cohort, 9.4 mm in a Turkish population, and 6.5 mm or more behind the inter-zygomatic line in a Canadian population. [162223] In addition to the inherent genetic and racial differences, this result may be complicated by the variability in prevalence of myopia in these subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the normal interzygomatic distance has been reported to lies between 9 and 109 mm. [ 6 13 21 24 ] Similar values were also seen in the present study, with the mean interzygomatic distance of 88.4 ± 9.09 [SD] mm, 89.76 ± 8.55 [SD] mm in males and 86.90 ± 9.49 [SD] mm in females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In another study, Aiyekomogbon et al . [ 21 ] reported a value of 6.5 mm in a Nigerian cohort. Furthermore, Gupta et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Distance is measured between this line and the anterior (normal <21 mm) or posterior globe margin (normal <5mm). 5,6 There are also different methods to measure proptosis. Various instruments have been designed for clinical measurement of proptosis, ranging from a simple ruler to more precise instruments like hertel, naugle and leudde's exophthalmometers but hertel exophthalmometer which was designed in 1905 is most commonly used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%