2002
DOI: 10.1109/tsmca.2002.802819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative design of organizations. I. Mission planning

Abstract: This paper presents a design methodology for synthesizing organizations to execute complex missions efficiently. It focuses on devising mission planning strategies to optimally achieve mission goals while optimally utilizing organization's resources. Effective planning is often the key to successful completion of the mission, and conversely, mission failure can often be traced back to poor planning. Details on subsequent phases of the design process to construct the mission-driven human organizations are discu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While this interdisciplinary interaction between engineering, particularly computer science and robotics, and biology is now commonplace (Di Caro and Dorigo 1998;Foukia et al 2003;Di Caro et al 2004, January;Gerkey and Matarić 2004;Mullen et al 2009;Rubenstein et al 2014), it is to our knowledge still rare for the science of organizations or management and biology, and in many of the existing cases, production processes, not the human workers themselves, are modeled as the equivalent to the 'workers' discussed here (Fulkerson and Staffend 1997;Cicirello and Smith 2004;Frayret et al 2004). Perhaps this is in part due to the difficulty of translating research findings from biology to the social sciences and vice versa (though see: Pugh et al 1969;Levchuk et al 2002;Helbing and Balietti 2011), or perhaps due to the fact that in designing optimal strategies for human organizations, the selfish motives of individuals play an overshadowing role (Itoh 1992; note that "selfish" is used here not in a moral sense, but purely in the sense that individual payoffs, as well as group-level performance, have to be optimized in human organizations, unlike in social insect organizational strategies). However, such questions as what is the ideal ratio of specialists to generalists, how does fluctuation in demand for different jobs affect the optimal level of specialization, and may there be benefits in terms of efficiency, flexibility, or robustness to having 'surplus' workers, are universal across many social and engineered complex systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this interdisciplinary interaction between engineering, particularly computer science and robotics, and biology is now commonplace (Di Caro and Dorigo 1998;Foukia et al 2003;Di Caro et al 2004, January;Gerkey and Matarić 2004;Mullen et al 2009;Rubenstein et al 2014), it is to our knowledge still rare for the science of organizations or management and biology, and in many of the existing cases, production processes, not the human workers themselves, are modeled as the equivalent to the 'workers' discussed here (Fulkerson and Staffend 1997;Cicirello and Smith 2004;Frayret et al 2004). Perhaps this is in part due to the difficulty of translating research findings from biology to the social sciences and vice versa (though see: Pugh et al 1969;Levchuk et al 2002;Helbing and Balietti 2011), or perhaps due to the fact that in designing optimal strategies for human organizations, the selfish motives of individuals play an overshadowing role (Itoh 1992; note that "selfish" is used here not in a moral sense, but purely in the sense that individual payoffs, as well as group-level performance, have to be optimized in human organizations, unlike in social insect organizational strategies). However, such questions as what is the ideal ratio of specialists to generalists, how does fluctuation in demand for different jobs affect the optimal level of specialization, and may there be benefits in terms of efficiency, flexibility, or robustness to having 'surplus' workers, are universal across many social and engineered complex systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landing campaign of a joint operation is setting for simulation analysis, the timing relation graph of the mission and detailed parameters of the platform and task are described in [10].…”
Section: A Mission Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…US Forces developed Computer-Aided Mission Planning System (CAMPS), which have assistant calculation function. The typical system of CAMPS are Mission Support System I(MSS I) and Mission Support System II (MSS II) [7]. US Forces equipped on F-15 fighter and F-16 fighter with MSS I and MSS II.…”
Section: ) Tactic Mpsmentioning
confidence: 99%