2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed® ST4 system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
74
3
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
20
74
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These effect magnitudes were considered subtle, compared to the random fluctuations expected from repeated measures in this type of experimental design [21,22]. The most prominent differences between SKIN and PIN occurred in kinematic data with up to 25% of ROM (~2-3°).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effect magnitudes were considered subtle, compared to the random fluctuations expected from repeated measures in this type of experimental design [21,22]. The most prominent differences between SKIN and PIN occurred in kinematic data with up to 25% of ROM (~2-3°).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the authors' knowledge, extensive data are lacking in the literature. Compared to the standard procedures specified by the manufacturer, Oosterlinck et al (2009) used a refined calibration technique as described by Putti et al (2008) whereby a static measurement was performed with a person standing on the PP on one limb. Subsequently, the recalibration factor was fine-tuned until the recorded vertical force was equivalent to the bodyweight of that person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure values and stabilometric measurements, such as the ones based on the centre of pressure (Putti et al 2008;Maetzler et al 2010), were acquired with this device at 25 Hz.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%