2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1062-1458(02)01004-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The filled circle at the bottom of each plot is the pooled sensitivity or specificity using a random-effects model. the pretest prevalence of PE was Ͻ10% even without the use of a decision rule or physician suspicion to select for low-risk individuals (27,28 ). Indeed, over the past 5 years, published studies of outpatients evaluated for PE with the D-dimer have demonstrated a steady reduction in the overall prevalence of PE, which suggests that physicians are becoming more comfortable with the Ddimer and are expanding its use in patients who might not be evaluated with an objective test if the only option for testing were the use of pulmonary vascular imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The filled circle at the bottom of each plot is the pooled sensitivity or specificity using a random-effects model. the pretest prevalence of PE was Ͻ10% even without the use of a decision rule or physician suspicion to select for low-risk individuals (27,28 ). Indeed, over the past 5 years, published studies of outpatients evaluated for PE with the D-dimer have demonstrated a steady reduction in the overall prevalence of PE, which suggests that physicians are becoming more comfortable with the Ddimer and are expanding its use in patients who might not be evaluated with an objective test if the only option for testing were the use of pulmonary vascular imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1 presents the D-dimer and stroke volume data, describcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and modified Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), which places the scores in reverse order. To analyze the initial NIHSS results, we divided the patients into three categories according to this baseline NIHSS score : mild (0-6), moderate (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), and severe (16 and above) 1,38) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high negative predictive value (99.6%) led these authors to conclude that a negative D-dimer Elisa assay can almost always exclude PE in the emergency department setting. 13 Further studies are necessary in patients undergoing full leg duplex ultrasonography before adopting this method for venous thrombosis diagnosis. Screening methods emphasizing cost-effectiveness are limited in that even one mistake in diagnosis may result in a preventable death.…”
Section: D-dimer Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%