2002
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2002.1013265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonmelt laser annealing of 5-KeV and 1-KeV boron-implanted silicon

Abstract: Abstract-Nonmelt laser annealing has been investigated for the formation of ultrashallow, heavily doped regions. With the correct lasing and implant conditions, the process can be used to form ultrashallow, heavily doped junctions in boron-implanted silicon. Laser energy in the nonmelt regime has been supplied to the silicon surface at a ramp rate greater than 10 C/s. This rapid ramp rate will help decrease dopant diffusion while supplying enough energy to the surface to produce dopant activation. High-dose, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the much shorter duration time of excimer laser annealing (<200 ns) is comparable to that of some basic point-defect related phenomena, such as Si interstitial diffusion and clustering 11 , which makes the defect-formation mechanism itself questionable in this annealing regime. In addition, most of the existing studies of defect formation in laser annealed silicon have been carried out in preamorphised structures: (i) after non-melt anneals, conventional endof-range defects ({311} defects and {111} DLs) have been observed [12][13][14] ; (ii) in the case of melt laser annealing, the defects nature depends on the position of the melt front with respect to the amorphous/crystalline, a/c, interface (stacking faults are observed in the case of incomplete melting of the preamorphised layer, 15 defect-free crystalline silicon is found when melting goes beyond the a/c interface 16 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the much shorter duration time of excimer laser annealing (<200 ns) is comparable to that of some basic point-defect related phenomena, such as Si interstitial diffusion and clustering 11 , which makes the defect-formation mechanism itself questionable in this annealing regime. In addition, most of the existing studies of defect formation in laser annealed silicon have been carried out in preamorphised structures: (i) after non-melt anneals, conventional endof-range defects ({311} defects and {111} DLs) have been observed [12][13][14] ; (ii) in the case of melt laser annealing, the defects nature depends on the position of the melt front with respect to the amorphous/crystalline, a/c, interface (stacking faults are observed in the case of incomplete melting of the preamorphised layer, 15 defect-free crystalline silicon is found when melting goes beyond the a/c interface 16 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Among the other processes nonmelt laser annealing has gained attention as a means of achieving these requirements by its short process time and high annealing temperature, and hence low thermal budget, resulting in high dopant solubility. [2][3][4][5] A problem exists with creating highly active profiles when boron is implanted in conjunction with a preamorphizing germanium implant; deactivation occurs during postactivation thermal processes. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] This deactivation is thought to be driven by the release of silicon interstitials from end-of-range ͑EOR͒ defects that evolve through nonconservative Ostwald ripening during annealing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with control samples, the LA sample with pre-annealing shows *a significant reduction of junction depth. [9] Figure 3 shows the junction depth and sheet resistance of samples annealed in various conditions. Compared with control RTA sample, the LA sample with pre-annealing shows much shallow junction depth while maintaining sheet resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%