2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2385215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deactivation of ultrashallow boron implants in preamorphized silicon after nonmelt laser annealing with multiple scans

Abstract: Electrical activation and redistribution of 500 eV boron implants in preamorphized silicon after nonmelt laser annealing at 1150°C and isochronal rapid thermal postannealing are reported. Under the thermal conditions used for a nonmelt laser at 1150°C, a substantial residue of end-of-range defects remained after one laser scan but these were mainly dissolved within ten scans. The authors find dramatic boron deactivation and transient enhanced diffusion after postannealing the one-scan samples, but very little … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the much shorter duration time of excimer laser annealing (<200 ns) is comparable to that of some basic point-defect related phenomena, such as Si interstitial diffusion and clustering 11 , which makes the defect-formation mechanism itself questionable in this annealing regime. In addition, most of the existing studies of defect formation in laser annealed silicon have been carried out in preamorphised structures: (i) after non-melt anneals, conventional endof-range defects ({311} defects and {111} DLs) have been observed [12][13][14] ; (ii) in the case of melt laser annealing, the defects nature depends on the position of the melt front with respect to the amorphous/crystalline, a/c, interface (stacking faults are observed in the case of incomplete melting of the preamorphised layer, 15 defect-free crystalline silicon is found when melting goes beyond the a/c interface 16 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the much shorter duration time of excimer laser annealing (<200 ns) is comparable to that of some basic point-defect related phenomena, such as Si interstitial diffusion and clustering 11 , which makes the defect-formation mechanism itself questionable in this annealing regime. In addition, most of the existing studies of defect formation in laser annealed silicon have been carried out in preamorphised structures: (i) after non-melt anneals, conventional endof-range defects ({311} defects and {111} DLs) have been observed [12][13][14] ; (ii) in the case of melt laser annealing, the defects nature depends on the position of the melt front with respect to the amorphous/crystalline, a/c, interface (stacking faults are observed in the case of incomplete melting of the preamorphised layer, 15 defect-free crystalline silicon is found when melting goes beyond the a/c interface 16 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 This approach has been proven in practice to reduce EOR defect density and TED. 7 In this letter, submelt laser annealing is employed in a different approach where EOR defect behavior during laser and further annealing is investigated when the position of the a / c interface is adjusted with respect to a B implant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deactivation of implanted B and As activated by high temperature annealing during subsequent annealing steps is well known. [22][23][24] It is thought to be driven by the release of Si interstitials from end-of-range (EOR) defects. Suppression of deactivation nuclei is equally important as is the enhancement of electrical activation of dopants.…”
Section: Ecs Journal Of Solid State Science and Technology 5 (2) P1-mentioning
confidence: 99%