Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology 2015
DOI: 10.1002/0471440264.pst216.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Testing of Polymers and Polymer–Matrix Composites

Abstract: Because of their unique properties, polymers and polymer–matrix composites pose both challenges and opportunities for nondestructive testing. The increasing use of these materials creates a demand for nondestructive verification of various properties or specifications, determination of structural integrity, or prediction of service‐life. On the other hand, development of new nondestructive test methods, improved sensitivity, or faster data acquisition and analysis may allow for nondestructive testing applicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 298 publications
(225 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All flexural moduli of pristine specimens exhibited a standard deviation within 5% of the respective average. This can be interpreted as reasonable, but not excellent, quality (high-quality CFRP can get down to about 2% scatter/standard deviation in modulus [ 47 ]. After fatigue testing, the highest scatter is found for the 350-type specimens (both f and c) rather than the c-5-330 type, whereas f-5-330 tends to be higher (around 9%), but not as much as the 350-type specimens.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All flexural moduli of pristine specimens exhibited a standard deviation within 5% of the respective average. This can be interpreted as reasonable, but not excellent, quality (high-quality CFRP can get down to about 2% scatter/standard deviation in modulus [ 47 ]. After fatigue testing, the highest scatter is found for the 350-type specimens (both f and c) rather than the c-5-330 type, whereas f-5-330 tends to be higher (around 9%), but not as much as the 350-type specimens.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the industry, microscopy is the most common method for detecting product defects. 8 However, this method cannot identify the internal defects of nontransparent parts. Computed tomography (CT) is a mature technique that is widely used in medical examinations and is suitable for quality control in industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques are employed to evaluate the quality of polymer parts. In the industry, microscopy is the most common method for detecting product defects . However, this method cannot identify the internal defects of nontransparent parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%