2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonclinical safety evaluation of erenumab, a CGRP receptor inhibitor for the prevention of migraine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no observed AE signal related to cardiovascular events. Although these clinical trials excluded patients with existing cardiovascular disease, the findings are consistent with dedicated preclinical and clinical studies that collectively showed no evidence for negative vascular effects in the setting of CGRP receptor antagonism with erenumab (2125). A detailed evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of erenumab (related to data pooled from these studies) is the subject of a separate analysis (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, there was no observed AE signal related to cardiovascular events. Although these clinical trials excluded patients with existing cardiovascular disease, the findings are consistent with dedicated preclinical and clinical studies that collectively showed no evidence for negative vascular effects in the setting of CGRP receptor antagonism with erenumab (2125). A detailed evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of erenumab (related to data pooled from these studies) is the subject of a separate analysis (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Finally, the current considerations in the development of anti-CGRP antibodies are identity, expression pattern, and function of CGRP receptors, which affect the safety and efficacy of these antibodies. Although CGRP is capable of activating multiple receptors, it binds with high affinity to two receptors, the CGRP receptor and Amylin-1 (AMY1) receptor, which are considered more physiological relevance than other receptors and play a central role in the molecular pathophysiology of the trigeminovascular system 38 , 39 . The function of anti-CGRP antibodies may exhibit different profiles in blocking the cross-talk between the peptides and their receptors 40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function of anti-CGRP antibodies may exhibit different profiles in blocking the cross-talk between the peptides and their receptors 40 . For instance, erenumab does not block the AMY1 receptor but only the CGRP receptor 38 . Therefore, further studies are warranted to investigate the therapeutic differences in these anti-CGRP antibodies targeting various CGRP-relevant receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As antibodies are considered to have a BBB permeability of <0.1% (18) and erenumab has been shown to be effective for the prophylactic treatment of migraine (19,20), it is considered that the mechanisms of action of erenumab are peripheral, with one of them being possibly inhibition of the CGRP-mediated vasodilation of the dural arteries (1). While erenumab has no vasoconstrictive properties per se (21), its success as prophylactic treatment may well be (partly) by effectively preventing the vasodilatory responses to CGRP in the HMMA, associated with the onset of migraine attacks. In accordance with this, human provocation studies have shown dilation of the HMMA on the headache side at migraine onset, and headache relief after vasoconstriction of the HMMA by sumatriptan (1,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%