Background: Migraine is two to three times more prevalent in women than in men, but the mechanisms involved in this gender disparity are still poorly understood. In this respect, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a key role in migraine pathophysiology and, more recently, the functional interactions between ovarian steroid hormones, CGRP and the trigeminovascular system have been recognized and studied in more detail. Aims: To provide an overview of CGRP studies that have addressed gender differences utilizing animal and human migraine preclinical research models to highlight how the female trigeminovascular system responds differently in the presence of varying ovarian steroid hormones. Conclusions: Gender differences are evident in migraine. Several studies indicate that fluctuations of ovarian steroid hormone (mainly estrogen) levels modulate CGRP in the trigeminovascular system during different reproductive milestones. Such interactions need to be considered when conducting future animal and human experiments, since these differences may contribute to the development of gender-specific therapies.

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder that involves activation of the trigeminovascular system and cranial vasodilation mediated by release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The gold standard for acute migraine treatment are the triptans, 5-HT receptor agonists. Their actions are thought to be mediated through activation of: (i) 5-HT receptors in cranial blood vessels with subsequent cranial vasoconstriction; (ii) prejunctional 5-HT receptors on trigeminal fibers that inhibit trigeminal CGRP release; and (iii) 5-HT receptors in central nervous system involved in (anti)nociceptive modulation. Unfortunately, coronary arteries also express 5-HT receptors whose activation would produce coronary vasoconstriction; hence, triptans are contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular disease. In addition, since migraineurs have an increased cardiovascular risk, it is important to develop antimigraine drugs devoid of vascular (side) effects. Ditans, here defined as selective 5-HT receptor agonists, were developed on the basis that most of the triptans activate trigeminal 5-HT receptors, which may explain part of the triptans' antimigraine action. Amongst the ditans, lasmiditan: (i) fails to constrict human coronary arteries; and (ii) is effective for the acute treatment of migraine in preliminary Phase III clinical trials. Admittedly, the exact site of action is still unknown, but lasmiditan possess a high lipophilicity, which suggests a direct action on the central descending antinociceptive pathways. Furthermore, since 5-HT receptors are located on trigeminal fibers, they could modulate CGRP release. This review will be particularly focussed on the similarities and differences between the triptans and the ditans, their proposed sites of action, side effects and their cardiovascular risk profile.

Background The exact mechanisms underlying the onset of a migraine attack are not completely understood. It is, however, now well accepted that the onset of the excruciating throbbing headache of migraine is mediated by the activation and increased mechanosensitivity (i.e. sensitization) of trigeminal nociceptive afferents that innervate the cranial meninges and their related large blood vessels. Objectives To provide a critical summary of current understanding of the role that the cranial meninges, their associated vasculature, and immune cells play in meningeal nociception and the ensuing migraine headache. Methods We discuss the anatomy of the cranial meninges, their associated vasculature, innervation and immune cell population. We then debate the meningeal neurogenic inflammation hypothesis of migraine and its putative contribution to migraine pain. Finally, we provide insights into potential sources of meningeal inflammation and nociception beyond neurogenic inflammation, and their potential contribution to migraine headache.

Although clinically distinguishable, migraine and cluster headache share prominent features such as unilateral pain, common pharmacological triggers such glyceryl trinitrate, histamine, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and response to triptans and neuromodulation. Recent data also suggest efficacy of anti CGRP monoclonal antibodies in both migraine and cluster headache. While exact mechanisms behind both disorders remain to be fully understood, the trigeminovascular system represents one possible common pathophysiological pathway and network of both disorders. Here, we review past and current literature shedding light on similarities and differences in phenotype, heritability, pathophysiology, imaging findings and treatment options of migraine and cluster headache. A continued focus on their shared pathophysiological pathways may be important in paving future treatment avenues that could benefit both migraine and cluster headache patients.

Headache is among the most frequent symptoms persisting or newly developing after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as part of the so-called long COVID syndrome. The knowledge on long COVID headache is still limited, however growing evidence is defining the features of this novel condition, in particular regarding clinical characteristics, some pathophysiological mechanisms and first treatment recommendations. Long COVID headache can present in the form of worsening of a preexisting primary headache, or, more specifically, in the form of a new (intermittent or daily) headache starting during the acute infection or after a delay. It often presents together with other long COVID symptoms, most frequently with hyposmia. It can manifest with a migrainous or, more frequently, with a tension-type-like phenotype. Persistent activation of the immune system and trigeminovascular activation are thought to play a role. As there are virtually no treatment studies, treatment currently is largely guided by the existing guidelines for primary headaches with the corresponding phenotype. The present report, a collaborative work of the international group of the Junior Editorial Board of The Journal of Headache and Pain aims to summarize the most recent evidence about long COVID headache and suggests approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of this disorder. Graphical Abstract

Migraine headache pathophysiology involves trigeminovascular system activation, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) release, and dysfunctional nociceptive transmission. Triptans are 5-HT1B/1D/(1F) receptor agonists that prejunctionally inhibit trigeminal CGRP release, but their vasoconstrictor properties limit their use in migraine patients with cardiovascular disease. By contrast, lasmiditan is a novel antimigraine and selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist devoid of vasoconstrictor properties. On this basis, this study has investigated the modulation of trigeminal CGRP release by lasmiditan. For this purpose, we have comparatively analysed the inhibition of several components of the trigeminovascular system induced by lasmiditan and sumatriptan through: ex vivo KCl-induced CGRP release from isolated dura mater, trigeminal ganglion, and trigeminal nucleus caudalis of mice; and in vivo dural vasodilation in the rat closed-cranial window model induced by endogenous (electrical stimulation and capsaicin) and exogenous CGRP. The ex vivo release of CGRP was similarly inhibited by sumatriptan and lasmiditan in all trigeminovascular system components. In vivo, intravenous (i.v.) lasmiditan or higher doses of sumatriptan significantly attenuated the vasodilatory responses to endogenous CGRP release, but not exogenous CGRP effects. These data suggest that lasmiditan prejunctionally inhibits CGRP release in peripheral and central trigeminal nerve terminals. Because lasmiditan is a lipophilic drug that crosses the blood–brain barrier, additional central sites of action remain to be determined.

Background: Headache is a common complication of traumatic brain injury. The International Headache Society defines post-traumatic headache as a secondary headache attributed to trauma or injury to the head that develops within seven days following trauma. Acute post-traumatic headache resolves after 3 months, but persistent posttraumatic headache usually lasts much longer and accounts for 4% of all secondary headache disorders. Main body: The clinical features of post-traumatic headache after traumatic brain injury resemble various types of primary headaches and the most frequent are migraine-like or tension-type-like phenotypes. The neuroimaging studies that have compared persistent post-traumatic headache and migraine found different structural and functional brain changes, although migraine and post-traumatic headache may be clinically similar. Therapy of various clinical phenotypes of post-traumatic headache almost entirely mirrors the therapy of the corresponding primary headache and are currently based on expert opinion rather than scientific evidence. Pharmacologic therapies include both abortive and prophylactic agents with prophylaxis targeting comorbidities, especially impaired sleep and post-traumatic disorder. There are also effective options for non-pharmacologic therapy of posttraumatic headache, including cognitive-behavioral approaches, onabotulinum toxin injections, lifestyle considerations, etc. Conclusion: Notwithstanding some phenotypic similarities, persistent post-traumatic headache after traumatic brain injury, is considered a separate phenomenon from migraine but available data is inconclusive. High-quality studies are further required to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms of this secondary headache, in order to identify new targets for treatment and to prevent disability.

Background and Purpose:Triptans are 5-HT 1B/1D receptor agonists (that also display 5-HT 1F receptor affinity) with antimigraine action, contraindicated in patients with coronary artery disease due to their vasoconstrictor properties. Conversely, lasmiditan was developed as an antimigraine 5-HT 1F receptor agonist. To assess the selectivity and cardiovascular effects of lasmiditan, we investigated the binding, functional activity, and in vitro/in vivo vascular effects of lasmiditan and compared it to sumatriptan.Experimental Approach: Binding and second messenger activity assays of lasmiditan and other serotoninergic agonists were performed for human 5-HT 1A , 5-HT 1B , 5-HT 1D , 5-ht 1E , 5-HT 1F , 5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2B , and 5-HT 7 receptors, and the results were correlated with their potency to constrict isolated human coronary arteries (HCAs). Furthermore, concentration-response curves to lasmiditan and sumatriptan were performed in proximal and distal HCA, internal mammary, and middle meningeal arteries. Finally, anaesthetized female beagle dogs received i.v. infusions of lasmiditan or sumatriptan in escalating cumulative doses, and carotid and coronary artery diameters were measured.Key Results: Lasmiditan showed high selectivity for 5-HT 1F receptors. Moreover, the functional potency of the analysed compounds to inhibit cAMP increase through 5-HT 1B receptor activation positively correlated with their potency to contract HCA.In isolated human arteries, sumatriptan, but not lasmiditan, induced contractions.Likewise, in vivo, sumatriptan decreased coronary and carotid artery diameters at clinically relevant doses, while lasmiditan was devoid of vasoconstrictor activity at all doses tested. ---This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conclusions and Implications:Lasmiditan is a selective 5-HT 1F receptor agonist devoid of vasoconstrictor activity. This may represent a cardiovascular safety advantage when compared to the triptans. SUPPORTING INFORMATIONAdditional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article. How to cite this article: Rubio-Beltrán E, Labastida-Ramírez A, Haanes KA, et al. Characterization of binding, functional activity, and contractile responses of the selective 5-HT 1F receptor agonist lasmiditan. Br J Pharmacol. 2019; https://doi.