Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory, pruritic form of dermatosis with heterogeneous manifestations that can substantially affect patients' quality of life. AD has a complex pathogenesis, making treatment challenging for dermatologists. The Janus kinase (JAK)–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway plays a central role in modulating multiple immune axes involved in the immunopathogenesis of AD. In particular, Th2 cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-31, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin, which contribute to the symptoms of chronic inflammation and pruritus in AD, are mediated by JAK–STAT signal transduction. Furthermore, JAK–STAT is involved in the regulation of the epidermal barrier and the modulation of peripheral nerves related to the transduction of pruritus. Targeting the JAK–STAT pathway may attenuate these signals and show clinical efficacy through the suppression of various immune pathways associated with AD. Topical and oral JAK inhibitors with variable selectivity have emerged as promising therapeutic options for AD. Notably, topical ruxolitinib, oral upadacitinib, and oral abrocitinib were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating patients with AD. Accordingly, the present study reviewed the role of JAK–STAT pathways in the pathogenesis of AD and explored updated applications of JAK inhibitors in treating AD.

No abstract

Background Vaccination has been promoted to control viral transmission in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Cases of new-onset or exacerbation of psoriasis, an immune-mediated inflammatory disease, were reported following COVID-19 vaccination. However, a comprehensive review examining the association between COVID-19 vaccination and the occurrence or exacerbation of psoriasis has yet to be performed. Objective The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes associated with psoriasis following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from database inception to April 25, 2022. The review included studies with relevant terms, including ‘psoriasis,’ ‘psoriasis vulgaris,’ ‘guttate psoriasis,’ ‘pustular psoriasis,’ ‘palmoplantar pustulosis,’ ‘psoriatic erythroderma,’ ‘psoriatic arthritis,’ ‘COVID-19,’ and ‘vaccine.’ We included all studies reporting at least one patient who developed new-onset psoriasis or experienced a psoriasis flare following at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. A flare was defined as the worsening of disease conditions after vaccination according to the study by Gregoire et al. The appraisal tool described by Murad et al. was used to assess the quality of case reports and series, whereas the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool was used to assess observational studies. Results The initial search yielded 367 results, including 7 studies reporting new-onset psoriasis, 32 studies reporting psoriasis flares, and 4 studies reporting both. The most commonly observed psoriasis subtype was plaque-type psoriasis. mRNA vaccines, including those produced by Moderna and BioNTech/Pfizer, were frequently associated with subsequent psoriasis episodes. First, second, and third vaccine doses were associated with psoriasis incidents, with the second dose most frequently associated with psoriasis flares. Delayed onset was observed, ranging from 2 to 21 days in the new-onset group and from 1 to 90 days in the flare group. Most patients experienced favorable outcomes, with improvement or resolution occurring within 3 days to 4 months. Conclusions Both new-onset psoriasis and psoriasis flares were reported as cutaneous adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. Psoriatic patients may require regular follow-up before and after COVID-19 vaccination. Trial Registration Review registration number PROSPERO database: CRD42022304157. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40257-022-00721-z.

We aimed to evaluate the response rate of migraines by using anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) for patients with migraines. We searched three main medical databases up to 29 March 2019. No restriction on language and publication time were applied. Eligible trials included randomized clinical trials investigating a 50%, 75%, and 100% response rate of migraine patients after anti-CGRP intervention. The collected data were dichotomous, and risk ratios (RRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to present the quantitative synthesis results. The systematic review identified 16 eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with 9439 patients. Eight of the 16 trials with 2516 patients reported a 50% response rate, and the pooled results showed a significant benefit from anti-CGRP. However, the effects seem to gradually reduce from the first month (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.49) to the third month (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.75) of treatment. The magnitude of effect was influenced by the type of anti-CGRP, according to the test for differences between subgroups (I-square = 53%). The funnel plots and Egger’s tests did not show serious small study effects in the results. In conclusion, the current evidences confirmed that anti-CGRP treatment can reduce migraine pain in the short term (within three months), but the long-term effect should be investigated in the future. Moreover, its effects may be influenced by the type and dose of anti-CGRP. Therefore, future studies should make direct comparisons among anti-CGRP medications.

No abstract

Background and Objectives: Despite the well-established association between bullous pemphigoid (BP) and neurological diseases, the association between BP and psychiatric disorders remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between BP and various psychiatric disorders.Patients and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for the identification of eligible cohort and case-control studies until May 30, 2021. Meta-analyses of crude estimates and adjusted estimates of odds ratio (OR) for case-control studies and hazard ratio (HR) cohort studies were then conducted.Results: Sixteen studies involving 637,285 patients were included for the qualitative synthesis. In the meta-analysis of adjusted estimates for case-control studies, patients with BP exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders (OR 1.77, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.92) and schizophrenia (OR 2.63,. Regarding the analysis of adjusted estimates of cohort studies, BP presented no significantly higher risk of depression (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.94-1.26) and schizophrenia (HR 1.35,).

Summary The topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) tacrolimus and pimecrolimus have been used widely as corticosteroid‐sparing agents in treating various cutaneous diseases. However, the association between TCIs and risk of malignancy remains controversial. By systematic review and meta‐analysis, we aimed to investigate the association between TCIs and lymphoma. Eligible studies in online databases were identified from the date of inception to August 30, 2020. To assess the outcome of TCI‐related risk of lymphoma, analysis of cohort studies comparing the incidence of lymphoma with and without treatment with TCIs was performed. Furthermore, the subgroup analyses of Hodgkin lymphoma and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma were also conducted. The pooled results revealed that using topical tacrolimus (RR 1.68, 95 % CI 1.39–2.04) or pimecrolimus (RR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.13–1.74) significantly increased the risk of lymphoma. TCI users also showed higher incidence of lymphoma in the range of 0.02–0.09 %, compared to that of 0.02–0.06 % in the control group. Additionally, subgroup analyses showed both tacrolimus (RR 1.89; 95 % CI 1.53–2.32) and pimecrolimus (RR 1.38; 95 % CI 1.09–1.74) had significantly higher risk of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, but no increased risk of Hodgkin lymphoma. In conclusion, TCI‐exposed patients have a significantly increased risk of lymphoma, especially non‐Hodgkin lymphoma.

No abstract