2013
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201201083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonaqueous CE ESIITMS analysis of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids

Abstract: The Amaryllidaceae are widely distributed medical plants. Lycorine, lycoramine, lycoremine, and lycobetaine are the major active alkaloids in Amaryllidaceae plants. A nonaqueous CE ESI-IT-MS method for separation, identification, and quantification of the Amaryllidaceae alkaloids has been developed. The MS(1-3) behavior has been studied and the fragmentation pathways of main fragment ions have been proposed. The effects of several factors such as composition and concentration of buffer, applied voltage, compos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) allows the separation of both charged and neutral analytes, and it provides additional separation selectivity for charged species that are difficult to separate by CZE, as separation is based on a combination of electrophoretic and chromatographic mechanisms [184]. In recent years, nonaqueous CE (NACE), which is based on electrolyte solutions prepared from pure organic solvents, has become increasingly popular for phytochemical analyses because of the good solubility of many target analytes in the organic mobile phases, alternative selectivity characteristics, reduced electrophoretic currents, and a very good feasibility for coupling with MS detectors [173,185]. In general, CE instruments can be coupled with similar detectors as LC instruments, like UV, DAD, ELSD, and MS detectors.…”
Section: Chromatographic and Hyphenated Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) allows the separation of both charged and neutral analytes, and it provides additional separation selectivity for charged species that are difficult to separate by CZE, as separation is based on a combination of electrophoretic and chromatographic mechanisms [184]. In recent years, nonaqueous CE (NACE), which is based on electrolyte solutions prepared from pure organic solvents, has become increasingly popular for phytochemical analyses because of the good solubility of many target analytes in the organic mobile phases, alternative selectivity characteristics, reduced electrophoretic currents, and a very good feasibility for coupling with MS detectors [173,185]. In general, CE instruments can be coupled with similar detectors as LC instruments, like UV, DAD, ELSD, and MS detectors.…”
Section: Chromatographic and Hyphenated Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, NACE, using organic solvents instead of water, was used in CZE. ACN , methanol , 1‐propanol , or their mixture were commonly used. Besides, a novel and very simple NACE method has been established for analyzing seven quaternary alkaloids in Coptis rhizome using 1‐alkyl‐3‐methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate‐based ionic liquid (IL) as BGE.…”
Section: Separation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of CE is the low detection capability, and the utilization of hyphenated MS detection offers high sensitivity and the possibility of structurally characterizing the analytes. Sheath liquid is widely used for transferring analytes from liquid phase of CE to gas phase of MS . Actually, various sheathless interfaces have been developed to enhance the concentration sensitivity of CE–MS .…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It could also be used for the synthesis of RNA and proteins , suppressing the growth of cells and the activity of the acetylcholine . There are many determination methods for GA and LY, such as UV‐visible spectrometry , chemiluminescence , fluorescence spectrometry , spectrophotometry , chromatography with MS , radioimmunoassay and so on. But these methods are either highly costly, or time consuming, or dangerous to operate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%