Non-piezoelectric effects in piezoresponse force microscopy

Abstract

Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) has been used extensively for exploring nanoscale ferro/piezoelectric phenomena over the past two decades. The imaging mechanism of PFM is based on the detection of the electromechanical (EM) response induced by the inverse piezoelectric effect through the cantilever dynamics of an atomic force microscopy. However, several non-piezoelectric effects can induce additional contributions to the EM response, which often lead to a misinterpretation of the measured PFM response. This review aims to summarize the non-piezoelectric origins of the EM response that impair the interpretation of PFM measurements. We primarily discuss two major non-piezoelectric origins, namely, the electrostatic effect and electrochemical strain. Several approaches for differentiating the ferroelectric contribution from the EM response are also discussed. The review suggests a fundamental guideline for the proper utilization of the PFM technique, as well as for achieving a reasonable interpretation of observed PFM responses.

Probing of Local Multifield Coupling Phenomena of Advanced Materials by Scanning Probe Microscopy Techniques

“…Moreover, ferroelectric‐like behaviors induced by charge injection and electrostatic force has been discriminated using contact Kelvin probe force microscopy (cKPFM) technique, and a simple AC sweep till high amplitude also helped to differentiate piezoelectric and nonpiezoelectric responses . More related information can be found in the review article by Seol et al On the other hand, a newly developed SPM technique adopting a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) was able to accurately measure the cantilever dynamics and thus contributed to quantify electromechanical strain …”

Micro/Nanostructure Engineering of Epitaxial Piezoelectric α-Quartz Thin Films on Silicon

“…5). The PFM amplitude image is represented in Figure 5a to a topographic crosstalk artifact which is well known and reported by the community 18 . We were able to corroborate the electromechanical behavior of our films by performing point-out spectroscopy measurements, see Fig.…”

Nanoscale Probing of Ferroelectric Domain Switching Using Piezoresponse Force Microscopy

“…In general cases, other artifacts besides piezoresponse can be added to the measured tip deflection amplitude A, such as capacitive cantilever-surface interaction and electrostatic contribution between the tip and the surface. 4,7,8,[10][11][12][13] These electrostatic artifacts can be reduced by using sufficiently stiff cantilevers, i.e., with high spring constants (e.g., above 40 N/m). 4,14) In addition, hysteretic surface charging 15,16) or ionic motion 11,[17][18][19][20][21] can generate PFM-like responses even in nonferroelectric samples.…”