2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.184526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise properties of nanoscale YBa2Cu3O7δJosephson

Abstract: We present electric noise measurements of nanoscale biepitaxial YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7−δ (YBCO) Josephson junctions fabricated by two different lithographic methods. The first (conventional) technique defines the junctions directly by ion milling etching through an amorphous carbon mask. The second (soft patterning) method makes use of the phase competition between the superconducting YBCO (Y123) and the insulating Y 2 BaCuO 5 (Y211) phase at the grain boundary interface on MgO (110) substrates. The voltage noise prop… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our extracted tunneling matrix element values are also significantly smaller than those reported by Z. Kim, et al, 10 Discrete critical current fluctuators have been reported in current biased Josephson junctions, identified via either a random telegraph signal in the voltage time trace or a signature Lorentzian bump in the noise spectrum. 23,24,40,41 One way we can compare our TLS's to others is to calculate the effective defect area A eff given by A eff = (∆E J /E J ) A j . For our device find A eff ≈ 18, 000 nm 2 where A j = 350 × 150 nm 2 is the junction area.…”
Section: Fitting and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our extracted tunneling matrix element values are also significantly smaller than those reported by Z. Kim, et al, 10 Discrete critical current fluctuators have been reported in current biased Josephson junctions, identified via either a random telegraph signal in the voltage time trace or a signature Lorentzian bump in the noise spectrum. 23,24,40,41 One way we can compare our TLS's to others is to calculate the effective defect area A eff given by A eff = (∆E J /E J ) A j . For our device find A eff ≈ 18, 000 nm 2 where A j = 350 × 150 nm 2 is the junction area.…”
Section: Fitting and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical current fluctuations, in ordinary tunnel-like Josephson junctions (JJs), are usually associated to bistable charge trapping states in the junction barrier. 26,27 In our nanowires instead, the critical current noise might be caused by fluctuations of the electronic nematic order. 28,29 However, the detailed understanding of the physical mechanisms responsible for such behavior in our nanowires is not known yet and would require further systematic studies, which goes well beyond the scope of the present work.…”
Section: B Noise Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The patterning of HTS films on the nano scale is an extremely challenging task. The most viable technology is the pattern transfer through a hard mask using Ar ion etching [22,23]. However, the detrimental effect of the Ar ion etching on the exposed surfaces of YBCO causes damaged layers having reduced superconducting or even insulating properties [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We drastically improved the nano-patterning of YBCO obtaining nano bridges without any deterioration of the superconducting properties, as we will show below. This has been achieved by using electron beam lithography in combination with a 100 nm thick carbon mask and a very gentle ion milling to define the nanobridges [22,25]. Here we used an ion acceleration voltage close to the threshold value of V 300 V, below which YBCO is not etched.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%