1981
DOI: 10.1051/jphyscol:1981725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NOISE AND DIFFUSIVITY OF HOT ELECTRONS IN n-TYPE InSb

Abstract: The experimental results and Monte-Carlo calculations of hot electron noise are presented for n-InSb at 77 K and 10 K. The influence of inelastic optical as well as ionized impurity scattering on the noise characteristics is examined

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under dynamical conditions, such a cyclic motion with the transit-time frequency f E = 1/τ E produces a variety of quite important physical phenomena. For example, the transittime frequency manifests itself in: (i) damping oscillations of the carrier velocity and energy during a transient response of the carrier ensemble under a step-like switching of the dc electric field [9], (ii) resonant enhancement of the current noise spectrum at a frequency close to f E [10][11][12], (iii) a bunching of carriers in momentum space [13][14][15], (iv) noise upconversion effects [16] under alternating (ac) electric field, etc.…”
Section: Transit-time Resonance: Concept and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under dynamical conditions, such a cyclic motion with the transit-time frequency f E = 1/τ E produces a variety of quite important physical phenomena. For example, the transittime frequency manifests itself in: (i) damping oscillations of the carrier velocity and energy during a transient response of the carrier ensemble under a step-like switching of the dc electric field [9], (ii) resonant enhancement of the current noise spectrum at a frequency close to f E [10][11][12], (iii) a bunching of carriers in momentum space [13][14][15], (iv) noise upconversion effects [16] under alternating (ac) electric field, etc.…”
Section: Transit-time Resonance: Concept and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 reports the results of available calculations and experiments for various bulk materials and 2D structures already shown in figure 4 in terms of universal materialindependent generation bands. Such a universal representation is obtained when the electric field E and the generation frequency f gen are normalized, respectively, to the effective electric field of po-phonon emission (10) and the po-phonon effective scattering rate given by:…”
Section: Dynamic Negative Differential Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smaller the penetration into the active region is the closer the carrier moves to the cyclic trajectory. Such a cyclic motion is responsible for a number of effects, including transient velocity oscillations in a nonstationary state, 29 oscillations of the correlation function of velocity fluctuations and corresponding sharp peak of the spectral density of velocity fluctuations at the transit time frequency, E ϭ1/ E , in a stationary state, 18,19,30 etc. In particular, these conditions were found [31][32][33][34] to favor the onset of highfrequency NDM which can arise in frequency regions near the resonant frequencies corresponding to the fundamental and higher harmonics of E .…”
Section: General Conditions For Opttrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial measurements of the PSD versus electric field in GaAs exhibited a peak at an electric field around the onset of negative differential resistance (∼ 2 − 3 kV cm −1 ) [32]. Although the quantitative results may have been complicated by a non-negligible time-domain response of the electric circuit used in the experiment [33], later measurements using microwave pulses confirmed the trend [34,35]. The first numerical investigations of noise phenomena in GaAs focused primarily on calculating the diffusion coefficient at high fields [36], noting that the high-field diffusion coefficient differed substantially from that predicted using the Einstein relation [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%