2018
DOI: 10.1109/tsipn.2017.2689683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Node Placement and Distributed Magnetic Beamforming Optimization for Wireless Power Transfer

Abstract: Abstract-In multiple-input single-output (MISO) wireless power transfer (WPT) via magnetic resonant coupling, multiple transmitters are deployed to enhance the efficiency of power transfer to a single receiver by jointly adapting their source currents/voltages so as to constructively combine the induced magnetic fields at the receiver, a technique known as magnetic beamforming. In practice, since the transmitters (power chargers) are usually at fixed locations and the receiver (e.g. mobile phone) is desired to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, compared to inductive coupling, WPT via magnetic resonant coupling has a relatively loose requirement on coil alignment. Leveraging this technique, a team from MIT has demonstrated lighting up a 60W light-bulb over 2 meters with about 40% efficiency [15], which has since spurred numerous research interests on this topic [2], [17]- [29]. Today, several interface standards have been developed for the two near-field WPT technologies, including Qi (pronounced as "Chee", coming from the Chinese word meaning "natural energy") by the Wireless Power Consortium [30], and AirFuel by the AirFuel Alliance (a merge of the former Alliance for the Wireless Power and Power Matters Alliance) [31].…”
Section: A Overview Of Wpt Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, compared to inductive coupling, WPT via magnetic resonant coupling has a relatively loose requirement on coil alignment. Leveraging this technique, a team from MIT has demonstrated lighting up a 60W light-bulb over 2 meters with about 40% efficiency [15], which has since spurred numerous research interests on this topic [2], [17]- [29]. Today, several interface standards have been developed for the two near-field WPT technologies, including Qi (pronounced as "Chee", coming from the Chinese word meaning "natural energy") by the Wireless Power Consortium [30], and AirFuel by the AirFuel Alliance (a merge of the former Alliance for the Wireless Power and Power Matters Alliance) [31].…”
Section: A Overview Of Wpt Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As sensor nodes are generally designed for long term monitoring, their battery should be much larger than their energy consumption power, i.e., B c i . Consequently, the − − static, single [21] − data routing mobile [25] Chargers − static, multi [22] Chargers − data routing static, multi requirement of α i + c i x i ≤ B generally holds for all i, j.…”
Section: Wet Scheduling At Base Stationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that, most of the literatures ( [7], [9], [21]) considered the WET problems where the WSN deployment is given, whereas the work in [25] considers the deployment of the WET chargers to cover a certain region. In fact, the deployment of the sensor nodes, which relates to the total received energy and the per-node energy consumption, is also important to network lifetime.…”
Section: Comparisons and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the presented CPT systems are designed for low-power applications, including USB devices, lamps, and small robots [8,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73], where the transmitting distance is limited to the millimeter range. High efficiency is provided by MCR WPT for a longer transferring distance [23,34,[74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%