1996
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00154-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen mineralization and microbial biomass as affected by soil compaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
2
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
87
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization in response to increased compaction can be attributed to greater physical protection of SOM. Breland & Hansen (1996) reported that compaction reduced total porosity and altered pore size distribution, favoring the contribution of smaller pores, which could physically protect organic materials from microbial degradation. In compacted soils the smaller pore size obstructs soil solution movement and aeration and thus the activity of decomposing organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smaller soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization in response to increased compaction can be attributed to greater physical protection of SOM. Breland & Hansen (1996) reported that compaction reduced total porosity and altered pore size distribution, favoring the contribution of smaller pores, which could physically protect organic materials from microbial degradation. In compacted soils the smaller pore size obstructs soil solution movement and aeration and thus the activity of decomposing organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These adverse effects of soil compaction on microbial activity seem to result mainly from losses in biopores and other macropores connectivity (Whalley et al, 1995). Low O 2 concentration (< 2-5 %) (Parr & Reuszer, 1962) and low macroporosity (< 10 %) (Linn & Doran, 1984) cause a reduction in the aerobic microbial activity, and may favor N losses by denitrification (Breland & Hansen, 1996;Jensen et al, 1996a;Ruser et al, 2006). Accordingly, soil respiration (CO 2 production) is a useful indicator of soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition (Hassink, 1994;Lee et al, 1996), by both aerobic and anaerobic microbes, which is a clear advantage over techniques based on O 2 uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, compaction led to a higher bulk density in the compacted soil compared to the uncompacted soil. Noteworthily, increased Table 1 Mean (±SE, n =3) microbial respiration and DEA for the uncompacted and compacted soils at three specific sampling times bulk density, in many studies, has been shown to decrease CO 2 production by (a) diminishing soil aeration and subsequently restricting the associated microbial activity (Pengthamkeerati et al 2005;Silva et al 2011), (b) improving the proportion of small pores which could physically protect soil organic matter against microbial degradation (Breland and Hansen 1996), and (c) reducing gas diffusivity (Shestak and Busse 2005). However, on the other hand, compaction also caused a higher WFPS in the compacted soil (59 %) than the uncompacted soil (25 %).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compaction implies an increase in soil bulk density and in soil strength and consequently a decrease in air permeability and hydraulic conductivity (Whalley et al, 1995). As a result, N mineralization is reduced (Breland and Hansen, 1996). Moreover, compaction also affected microbial activity by reducing acid phosphatase (Jordan et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%