Niepamięć albo o sytuowaniu wiedzy o formach pamiętania

Sendyka, Roma

doi:10.18318/td.2016.6.14

Cited by 15 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…mushroom picking, hiking, farming) is subject to minor corrections, which go unnoticed by an external observer, but remain readable to local participants of the memory culture. Drawing on the work of Polish sociologists, we define the total set of these communicatively effective yet non-symbolic measures as non-memory, a term already mentioned above (Hirszowicz and Neyman 2007;Sendyka 2016b;Nowak et al 2018). 13.…”

Section: Results: Dynamic and Relational Microtopography Of A Difficult Pastmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, non-sites of memory are as constitutive for group identity as 'open' sites of memory. In this regard, our argument is that we do not deal here with amnesia or forgetting, with a permanent and ultimate removal of a particular object, but rather with another kind of negative work of memory: "non-memory" Neyman 2001, 2007;Kwiatkowski 2009;Nowak et al 2018), which is transferred unofficially, in personal, close circulation, through deformed symbolic means (myths, legends, maxims, broken sentences, linguistic slips), and especially though non-symbolic ones (gestures, facial expressions, voice prosody and timbre, body language, special interactions with things and people, routes around particular surroundings, practices of using a given area) (Sendyka 2016b).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Figure 1 from: Sendyka R (2021) Sites of violence and their communities: critical memory studies in the post-human era. International Journal of Heritage, Memory and Conflict 1: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3897/ijhmc.1.63263

Sendyka¹

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Results: Dynamic and Relational Microtopography Of A Difficult Pastmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Figure 1 from: Sendyka R (2021) Sites of violence and their communities: critical memory studies in the post-human era. International Journal of Heritage, Memory and Conflict 1: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3897/ijhmc.1.63263

Sendyka¹

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The non-sites of memory, usually deprived of any conventional memory practices, as locations for the deposition of human remains trigger specific types of behavior, even if in a negative mode. I see the sources of this type of behavior in the folk-traditional roots of those communities in which -in the absence of other discursive and symbolic frames into which sites left behind by the Holocaust from bullets could be interpreted -local "vernacular memory" developed (Sendyka 2016b). As Roma Sendyka suggests, the discourse on memory is multilayered and vernacular memory can be understood as a layer that is "closest to the ground", most narrowly located and often unheard (2016b, 252).…”

Section: Case Study: Marking Uncommemorated Burial Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vernacular memory and implicated communities

Janus¹

2021

IJHMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abandoned sites of trauma in Poland appear to be forgotten, but their removal from social and cultural circles is only superficial. Frequently, these sites are inscribed into the local culture of memory and members of the local Polish communities can usually locate them and share stories about them. However, as they are not commemorated, there is an ambivalent aura around them. In 2017 two foundations (Zapomniane Foundation, The Matzevah Foundation) carried out an intervention into the landscape of Poland by marking thirty burial sites of Jewish victims of the Holocaust with simple wooden markers. The effects of that intervention shed light on the vernacular local memory of the Holocaust and the folk-traditional roots of the practices and behaviors related to these sites.

show abstract

“…In the meaning that Roma Sendyka ascribes to "oblivion", distinguishing "non-remembering" from "forgetting"(Sendyka, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Memory in action – Performative practices in a dispute about the past: Serbia and Croatia at the turn of the 20th and 21st century

Giergiel

Taczyńska²

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Memory in action – Performative practices in a dispute about the past: Serbia and Croatia at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuryThe article is an attempt to combine in one reflection the elements of two directions of critical thinking: discursive and performative. The starting point of the analysis is the assumption (derived from beliefs common in pre-performative times) that every space (including a city’s territory) can be treated as a text. This means that both static artifacts and activities in a given space communicate a certain message and can be seen as signs or symbols that refer to something outside of them. Our reflection focuses on practices in which the performative potential is fully revealed and which can be interpreted as a kind of rebellion against the present reality and official policies of memory. The analyzed activities are understood here as symbolic and cultural practices and aim to introduce changes on several levels: to change the historical consciousness of community members; to affect the nuances and expansion of national memory (in this case Serbian or Croatian); to modify the nature of memory. We are interested in interventions that are usually undertaken by persons or groups located on the outskirts of the system of power. Pamięć w działaniu – praktyki performatywne w sporze o przeszłość. Serbia i Chorwacja na przełomie XX i XXI wiekuArtykuł stanowi próbę połączenia we wspólnej refleksji elementów dwóch kierunków myślenia krytycznego: dyskursywnego i performatywnego. Punktem wyjścia rozważań jest wywodzące się z przekonań patronujących czasom przedperformatywnym założenie, że każdą przestrzeń (w tym terytorium miasta) można traktować jako tekst. Oznacza to, że zarówno statyczne artefakty, jak i odbywające się w przestrzeni aktywne działania komunikują pewien przekaz i można je rozpatrywać jako znaki bądź symbole odsyłające do czegoś, co jest poza nimi. Nasza refleksja koncentruje się na praktykach, w których z całą mocą ujawnia się potencjał performatywny i które można odczytywać jako rodzaj buntu wobec zastanej rzeczywistości i obowiązujących polityk pamięci. Analizowane działania rozumiane są tutaj jako praktyki symboliczno-kulturowe, które stawiają sobie za cel wprowadzenie przekształceń na kilku poziomach: zmianę świadomości historycznej członków społeczności; wpłynięcie na zniuansowanie i poszerzenie pamięci narodowej (w tym wypadku serbskiej czy chorwackiej); modyfikację charakteru pamięci. Interesują nas interwencje podejmowane zwykle przez osoby bądź grupy sytuujące się na obrzeżach systemu władzy.

show abstract

Niepamięć albo o sytuowaniu wiedzy o formach pamiętania

Cited by 15 publications

References 0 publications

Figure 1 from: Sendyka R (2021) Sites of violence and their communities: critical memory studies in the post-human era. International Journal of Heritage, Memory and Conflict 1: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3897/ijhmc.1.63263

Figure 1 from: Sendyka R (2021) Sites of violence and their communities: critical memory studies in the post-human era. International Journal of Heritage, Memory and Conflict 1: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3897/ijhmc.1.63263

Vernacular memory and implicated communities

Memory in action – Performative practices in a dispute about the past: Serbia and Croatia at the turn of the 20th and 21st century

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About