Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptions

Abstract

Estimating actual and potential areas of distribution of species via ecological niche modeling has become a very active field of research, yet important conceptual issues in this field remain confused. We argue that conceptual clarity is enhanced by adopting restricted definitions of ''niche'' that enable operational definitions of basic concepts like fundamental, potential, and realized niches and potential and actual distributional areas. We apply these definitions to the question of niche conservatism, addressing what it is that is conserved and showing with a quantitative example how niche change can be measured. In this example, we display the extremely irregular structure of niche space, arguing that it is an important factor in understanding niche evolution. Many cases of apparently successful models of distributions ignore biotic factors: we suggest explanations to account for this paradox. Finally, relating the probability of observing a species to ecological factors, we address the issue of what objects are actually calculated by different niche modeling algorithms and stress the fact that methods that use only presence data calculate very different quantities than methods that use absence data. We conclude that the results of niche modeling exercises can be interpreted much better if the ecological and mathematical assumptions of the modeling process are made explicit.distributions modeling ͉ Grinnellian niches ͉ niche modeling ͉ scenopoetic variables

Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantitative Climate Reconstructions Based on Late-Quaternary Biological Proxies

“…Guisan & Zimmermann 2000;Anderson et al 2003;Thuiller et al 2003;Araújo et al 2005aAraújo et al , 2005bLeathwick et al 2005;Araújo & Guisan 2006;Elith et al 2006;Phillips & Dudik 2008;Baselga & Araújo 2009;Franklin 2010), it is widely used to predict impacts of future climate change on species distributions (e.g. Currie 2001;Shafer et al 2001;Thuiller et al 2005Thuiller et al , 2006Hamann & Wang 2006;Heikkinen et al 2006;Rehfeldt et al 2006;Levinsky et al 2007;Huntley et al 2008;Iverson et al 2008;Jeschke & Strayer 2008;Thuiller et al 2008;Lawler et al 2009;Soberón & Nakamura 2009;Franklin 2010;Yates et al 2010). There is currently much debate about the basic assumptions underlying this approach (e.g.…”

Ecology and the ratchet of events: Climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions

“…The niche has a rich and complex history, with usage falling into 2 clusters. The Eltonian niche emphasizes resource-consumption relationships among species, whereas the Grinnellian niche focuses on environmental factors, biotic and abiotic, that influence survival, growth, and reproduction of individuals (1)(2)(3).…”

Fine-scale ecological and economic assessment of climate change on olive in the Mediterranean Basin reveals winners and losers

“…ENMs are often used to predict the distribution of the species in response to climate change (13) despite serious deficiencies including the inability to include trophic interactions (14). Moreover, the implicit mathematical and ecological assumptions of ENMs hinder biological interpretation of the results (15).…”