Nexus among board characteristics, earnings management and dividend payout: evidence from an emerging market

Abstract

PurposeThe direct nexus between board characteristics, earnings management (EM) practices and dividend payout is examined in this study, followed by an examination of the indirect mediation impact of EM practices in the nexus between board characteristics and dividend payout. It aims to provide new empirical evidence from the Jordanian market, which is an emerging market.Design/methodology/approachThe study population consists of all service firms that were listed on the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE) between 2012 and 2019. Due to the lack of availability of their complete data during the period, four service firms were omitted from the population; hence, a sample of 43 service firms was acquired over the time frame (2012–2019), yielding a total of 344 firm-year observations. Moreover, panel data analysis was employed in this study, and data for the study were acquired from yearly reports as well as the ASE's database.FindingsBased on the GMM estimator findings, board size and independence have a negative and significant influence on the EM, but CEO/chairman duality has a positive and significant impact. Simultaneously, the impacts of female representation on the board of directors and the number of board meetings were both positive but insignificant. The findings also found that four board characteristics, including board size, female representation on the board of directors, CEO/chairman duality and the number of board meetings, had a significant negative or positive effect on dividend payout, while board independence did not. Additional findings show that EM practices have a direct negative insignificant effect on dividend payout, whereas EM practices partially mediate the relationship between board characteristics and dividend payout.Research limitations/implicationsThe current study's limitation is that it only searched in Jordanian service firms listed on ASE from 2012 to 2019 to fulfill the study's objectives; thus, we urge that future work explores the study models for other sectors, whether in Jordan or other growing markets such as the Middle East and North Africa.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study may be utilized by analysts, investors and other strategic decision-makers to enhance Jordan's financial market's efficiency and efficacy. These findings will improve policymakers' willingness to impose appropriate constraints, perhaps boosting Jordan's financial market performance and efficacy. These findings may also help investors make more enlightened judgments by utilizing board characteristics and EM factors that predict firm dividend policy.Originality/valueContradictions in the results of earlier investigations inspired the current study, with the findings filling a gap in the existing literature. This study differs from previous studies by constructing a novel research model and analyzing the mediating influence of EM in the nexus between board characteristics and dividend payout.

The Effect of Risk Management Committee Characteristics on Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation

“…A robust corporate governance system may build trust not only among investors, but also among consumers, employees and the broader community. When a corporation follows sound governance principles, it exhibits a commitment to ethical behaviour, social responsibility and sustainability (Abu Afifa et al, 2022; Gulzar et al, 2020). The recent CGC requirements issued by the JSC are assumed to enhance the Jordanian practices of corporate governance.…”

Impact of Firm’s Internal Factors on Payout Policy: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Pakistan

“…Return on assets impacts the payout policy in a negative manner and non-significantly . Inventory turnover ratio has non-significant positive impacts on payout policy (Afifa et al, 2022). The theory written in this study can be used as material for advanced research.…”

“…• The inventory turnover Ratio shows a correlation = 0.549 which means the higher efficiency of the firms positively impacts the payout policy and the P value=0.000 that is < 0.05 and 0.01 refers that there is a significant link between these variablesAzmal et al, (2019). means that the firm's efficiency has a positive but no-significant impact on payout policyHusain, T., &Sunardi, (2020); Afifa et al, (2022); Rehman et al, (2021).…”

An Analysis of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance Indicators on Discretionary Accruals

“…The developments in the financial markets and the globalization of businesses collectively bring immense competition which can be considered as the crucial factor firm information. As remarked by Abu-Afifa et al (2022) and Rusmin (2010) earning management (EM) practices deteriorate the trust of investors and other stakeholders in the quality of financial reporting (Veganzones et al, 2023). Firms due to earning management keep the figures stable by accumulating or removing cash from reserve accounts (Al-Fayoumi et al, 2010;Dechow et al, 1995).…”