2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newborn blood spot screening for cystic fibrosis with a four-step screening strategy in the Netherlands

Abstract: The program achieved the goal to minimize the number of false positives and showed a favourable performance but sensitivity and CF/CFSPID ratio did not meet criteria of EFCS Best Standards of Care. Changed cut-off values for PAP and IRT and classification of R117H-7T/9T to non-pathogenic may improve sensitivity to ≥95% and CF/CFSPID ratio to 10/1. PPV is estimated to be around 60%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond Ireland which has the highest incidence of CF in Europe (1:1353) [39], the incidence ranges from 1:2800 in the UK [38] to 1:10,000 in Russia [40] ( Figure 5). It is 1:2850 in Belgium [41], about 1:4500 in France [42], Germany [14], Italy [38,43,44], and Spain (where large regional variations are observed) [45], while it oscillates between 1:5200 and 1:6500 in Central Europe (Czech Republic [32], Denmark [46], Netherlands [47], Poland [48], Slovakia [49], and Sweden [50]). The incidence appears lower than 1:7000 in three European countries (Portugal [51], Norway [52], and Russia [40]) as well as in various regions of Spain [45].…”
Section: Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond Ireland which has the highest incidence of CF in Europe (1:1353) [39], the incidence ranges from 1:2800 in the UK [38] to 1:10,000 in Russia [40] ( Figure 5). It is 1:2850 in Belgium [41], about 1:4500 in France [42], Germany [14], Italy [38,43,44], and Spain (where large regional variations are observed) [45], while it oscillates between 1:5200 and 1:6500 in Central Europe (Czech Republic [32], Denmark [46], Netherlands [47], Poland [48], Slovakia [49], and Sweden [50]). The incidence appears lower than 1:7000 in three European countries (Portugal [51], Norway [52], and Russia [40]) as well as in various regions of Spain [45].…”
Section: Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este es el primer algoritmo que se usa en México y las experiencias nacionales e internacionales pueden contribuir a perfeccionarlo. 2,36,37 En otras regiones geográficas, parte de estos problemas se han resuelto mediante el fortalecimiento de la capacitación preanalítica, 27 con el uso de biomarcadores adicionales, sobre todo la biología molecular del gen CFTR y, más recientemente, la incorporación de la proteína asociada a pancreatitis (PAP), [38][39][40] y con el establecimiento de sistemas postanalíticos formales de seguimiento del tamiz neonatal. 26,28,37,41…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…One of the concerns about expanding CFTR panels beyond the previously common 23 CF-causing variants [60] has been the increase in incidental findings, particularly heterozygous infants, i.e., false positives with high IRT levels, one CFTR variant, and negative sweat tests. The PPV of the IRT/DNA test ranges from about 10% to 63% depending on the algorithm and the number of CFTR variants in the panel [61]. Detecting up to 10 carriers for every CF case diagnosed has been disconcerting for some, while others consider this an added benefit of CF NBS.…”
Section: Incidental Findings and Implications Of Emerging Data For Gementioning
confidence: 99%