Abstract:Digital platform firms are among the most valuable firms in the world due, in large part, to the ecosystems of complementors that have emerged around them. We explore the contradictory impact that platforms have on entrepreneurship. The ecosystem metaphor used to describe the network of interdependencies among the members is intrinsically flawed because it obscures the god-like powers of the platform owners. In fact, complementors are dependent entrepreneurs whose businesses and existence is largely determined… Show more
“…While the idea of companies acting as intermediaries is far from new, digital platforms are changing existing frameworks in their respective industries and reorganise the geography of doing business with complex and multiscale methods (Bearson et al . 2019; Grabher & König 2020; Grabher & van Tuijl 2020; Graham 2020; Katta et al . 2020).…”
Digital platforms, such as Amazon, represent the major beneficiaries of the Covid-19 crisis. This study examines the role of digital platforms and their engagement in digitalisation initiatives targeting (small) brick-and-mortar retailers in Germany, thereby contributing to a better understanding of how digital platforms augment, substitute or reorganise physical retail spaces. This study applies a mixed-method approach based on qualitative interviews, participant observation as well as media analysis. First, the study illustrates the controversial role of digital platforms by positioning themselves as supporting partners of the (offline) retailers, while simultaneously shifting power towards the platforms themselves. Second, digital platforms have established themselves not only as infrastructure providers but also as actors within these infrastructures, framing digital as well as physical retail spaces, inter alia due to their role as publicly legitimised retail advisers. Third, while institutions want to help retailers to survive, they simultaneously enhance retailers' dependency on digital platforms.
“…While the idea of companies acting as intermediaries is far from new, digital platforms are changing existing frameworks in their respective industries and reorganise the geography of doing business with complex and multiscale methods (Bearson et al . 2019; Grabher & König 2020; Grabher & van Tuijl 2020; Graham 2020; Katta et al . 2020).…”
Digital platforms, such as Amazon, represent the major beneficiaries of the Covid-19 crisis. This study examines the role of digital platforms and their engagement in digitalisation initiatives targeting (small) brick-and-mortar retailers in Germany, thereby contributing to a better understanding of how digital platforms augment, substitute or reorganise physical retail spaces. This study applies a mixed-method approach based on qualitative interviews, participant observation as well as media analysis. First, the study illustrates the controversial role of digital platforms by positioning themselves as supporting partners of the (offline) retailers, while simultaneously shifting power towards the platforms themselves. Second, digital platforms have established themselves not only as infrastructure providers but also as actors within these infrastructures, framing digital as well as physical retail spaces, inter alia due to their role as publicly legitimised retail advisers. Third, while institutions want to help retailers to survive, they simultaneously enhance retailers' dependency on digital platforms.
“…Such infiltration not only causes ‘disruption’ to established markets but also develops completely new ones, reshaping consumption practices (Bissell 2020 ), while also redefining value creation processes and reorganizing value chains (e.g. Schwarz 2017 ; Kiesling 2018 ; Bearson et al 2019 ; Kenney and Zysman 2019 ; Grabher and van Tuijl 2020 ). Further, platforms influence and even create their institutional and regulatory framework (Frenken et al 2018 ; Kirchner and Schüßler 2020 ), effectively becoming the market (Kenney et al 2020 ) and therewith shaping our economy and society.…”
Section: Digital Platforms – Reorganizing Urban Interactions and Operationsmentioning
Digital platforms, understood as multi-sided matchmakers, have amassed huge power, reimagining the role of consumers, producers, and even ownership. They increasingly dictate the way the economy and urban life is organized. Yet, despite their influential and far-reaching role in shaping our economic as well as sociocultural world, our understanding of their embeddedness, namely how their activities are embedded in systems of social and societal relationships and how they conceptualize their main functions and actions in relation to their wider setting, remains rudimentary. Consequently, the purpose of this frontier paper is threefold. Firstly, it reveals the need to discuss and evaluate (dis-)embedding processes in platform urbanism in order to understand the underlying dynamics of platform power and urban transformation. Secondly, it aims to reveal the main reasons in regard to the difficulties in pinpointing digital platforms embeddedness. Thirdly, it seeks to propose future research unravelling the (dis-)embeddedness of the platform economy.This paper argues for three main reasons namely unawareness, unaccountability and non-transparency of digital platforms that drive the lack of embeddedness and reaffirms platform power. This is mainly based on the configuration of new commodities, platforms’ strategic avoidance of labour protections and other regulatory frameworks as well as platforms’ secrecy in which they operate. This frontier paper argues that transferring the concept of embeddedness to the platform economy might serve as a valuable tool to understand and pinpoint essential dynamics and relationships at play, therefore proposing embeddedness as a basis for future research on the platform economy. It strongly argues that a more detailed understanding is urgently needed, in order to be able to understand, accompany and actively influence the development of the platform economy in regulatory terms.
“…Não é descabido criticar uma tentativa de se compreender o alcance de um regime de acumulação analisando-se apenas um de seus elementos constitutivos: a organização padrão empresarial. Embora seja um elemento central na constituição do regime, uma visão in toto exige complementar o estudo das empresas representativas com outros elementos, como o trabalho (BEARSON et al, 2019) e as normas elicitadas pelo novo papel do governo (VAN DIJCK; POELL; DE WAAL, 2018; ZYSMAN; KENNEY, 2018).…”
Esta é a resenha do livro " Platform capitalism", publicado em 2017 pelo autor Nick Srnicek, professor de economia digital do departamento de digital humanities do King’s College. Visando contribuir com a linha de pesquisa em economia digital e estudos de plataformas, a resenha foi escrita pelo autor Victo José da Silva Neto, doutorando do Programa de Política Científica e Tecnológica da Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
[Para ler a resenha completa, por favor, faça o download do PDF.]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.