Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Proceedings of International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and IC's: ISPSD '95
DOI: 10.1109/ispsd.1995.515055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New power device figure of merit for high-frequency applications

Abstract: A new power device figure of merit is proposed for highfrequency applications. Based on a theoretid analysis, the impacts of circuit topologies and material properties are examined. This figure of merit is very useful in optimizing or choosing a power device operating in high-frequency circuits. A thin-film SO1 power MOSFET is taken as an example, and the effect of its device parameters on the power loss is analyzed to provide a basic guideline for optimization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V 2 BR R on ) [6], materials such as GaN and SiC present comprehensive improvements in the breakdown voltage (V BR ) vs. on-resistance (R on ) tradeoff. Comparing other FOMs provide easy estimations of the relevant metrics (a) conduction and switching losses from the on-resistance × output capacitance product (R on × C oss ) [7] and (b) power density from 1 √ Q g R on A package R th [8] where A package is the package size and R th is the thermal resistance. The gate charge Q g represents the switching loss incurred by the charging and discharging cycles of the gate terminal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V 2 BR R on ) [6], materials such as GaN and SiC present comprehensive improvements in the breakdown voltage (V BR ) vs. on-resistance (R on ) tradeoff. Comparing other FOMs provide easy estimations of the relevant metrics (a) conduction and switching losses from the on-resistance × output capacitance product (R on × C oss ) [7] and (b) power density from 1 √ Q g R on A package R th [8] where A package is the package size and R th is the thermal resistance. The gate charge Q g represents the switching loss incurred by the charging and discharging cycles of the gate terminal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Company A's device is used in this experiment, it is the smallest. This product is tentatively named as "Efficiency Figure of merit" (EFOM), and is similar to the high-frequency figure-of-merit (BHFFOM [35] and NHFFOM [36]) of the device itself [37]. These indices in Refs.…”
Section: Theoretical Explanation Of Loss Minimum Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indices in Refs. [35][36][37] were used to evaluate the high-frequency characteristics of the device alone; however, because the discussion here is concerning increase of the maximum efficiency of the system, there is a difference between the efficiency of the device alone (EFOM) and the system, in which the total system conduction resistance r onall should be used as an evaluation of efficiency instead of the device on-state resistance.…”
Section: Theoretical Explanation Of Loss Minimum Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FOMs are used to compare materials/technologies and define their theoretical boundaries/ limitations. Some of these FOMs are important in the power electronics field in order to compare fairly devices and have a good indication of their performances [82][83][84][85][86][87]. These FOMs will be discussed herein, bringing insights for power electronics engineers about which characteristics should be taken into account when selecting active switches for project implementation.…”
Section: Comparison Between Gan and Si Semiconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed in [83], the FOM presented in (3) gives a good indication about the switching and conduction losses, since the energy stored at the output capacitance C oss is dissipated at the channel of the device in hard-switching applications (modeling switching losses), and the on-resistance R ds−on represents the conduction losses. Analyzing the data in Table 2, GaN devices present a better FOM and are a viable alternative for hard-switching applications with lower switching losses.…”
Section: Comparison Between Gan and Si Semiconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%