The reliance on economic concepts, most notably economic income, for the measurement of profit in financial accounting is misplaced. This paper explores the concept of economic income, contrasting it with the concept of profit in the conventional accounting model. The concept of individual economic income cannot be used for measurement of profit for a past period as the concept is based on the capitalisation of expectations and excludes "separate but correlated" concepts of profit and capital needed for capital maintenance. The relationship between accounting profit and economic income
AbstractThe ascendancy of economic concepts, most notably economic income, and reliance on them for the measurement of profit in financial accounting is misplaced. Schipper and Vincent (2003) and Justice Owen of the HIH Royal Commission provide recent examples of the dominance of economic ideas. This paper explores the concept of economic income, contrasting it with the concept of profit of the conventional accounting model.As Kaldor (1955) has shown, the Hicksian concept of individual economic income cannot be used for measurement of profit for a past period as the concept is based on the capitalisation of expectations, and excludes "separate but correlated" concepts of profit and capital, needed for capital maintenance. The Alexander/Solomons (1962) concept of variable income allowing for uncertainty is unable to escape the limitations of capitalised expectations. Attempts to develop support for a concept of current income from the economic model are also found wanting.Acceptance of these conclusions has implications for identifying relevant criteria in conceptual frameworks to guide the setting of accounting standards.