New institutional geographies of higher education: The rise of transregional university alliances

Abstract

This paper opens up debates about the deepening uneven geographies of higher education through a critical analysis of transregional university alliances. Focusing on the formation of research consortia and Doctoral Training Centres we reveal the emergence of over fifty transregional alliances between UK universities. Despite each consortium operating at a variously defined regional scale there has been no explicit attempt to account for their geographical basis. Providing the first-ever analysis of this unfolding phenomenon, we demonstrate how the rise of transregional alliances is indicative of, and a response to, universities operating in an intensely neoliberalised political economy. Bringing together emergent theories of regionalism with emerging worlds of (neoliberal) higher education, our paper reveals how, why and where universities are engaging in more intensively targeted, exclusive approaches to regional development. We argue that higher education is conducive to the weakening of fixed regional territories and propose the metaphor of 'regional constellations' for interpreting transregional geographies. Finally, our analysis suggests that while high-performing research institutions may compete better by forming consortia, transregional alliances lead to a more unequal and divided university sector.

Indexing third stream activities in UK universities: exploring the entrepreneurial/enterprising university

“…Since the Lambert (2003) Review there have been a number of government sponsored reviews of university roles in the wider economy, part of an ongoing debate (e.g. Rodríguez-Pose and Refolo, 2003;Smith, 2007;Mueller et al, 2012;Harrison et al, 2016. The Warry Report (2006, Sainsbury Review (2007) and Wilson Report (2012), all considered universities' changing economic roles.…”

Supplementary education and the coronavirus pandemic: Economic vitality, business spatiality and societal value in the private tuition industry during the first wave of Covid-19 in England

“…Geographical research on education to date has been strongly influenced by locational, socio-cultural, feminist and children’s geographies, such that studies which dominate examine questions about spatial and social equity in access; the material design of learning environments; education-related mobilities; and the making of young people’s subjectivities within educational spaces ( Kraftl et al, 2021 , Kučerová et al, 2020 , Waters, 2017 ). Research about the political-economy of education is of increasing importance too, as researchers pay greater attention to the marketisation of early years, school and higher education in neoliberal regimes ( Cohen, 2020 , Gallagher, 2018 , Harrison et al, 2016 , Hunter, 2019 ). Nevertheless, economic questions about supplementary education are only now being put onto the geographical agenda ( Holloway & Pimlott-Wilson, 2021 ).…”

Geographies of Schooling

“…The political importance of this policy agenda means that "the spaces in which education and learning take place are undergoing almost continual transformation" (Brooks, Fuller, & Waters, 2012, p. 1). Researchers in geographies of education have responded to these developments by tracing the restructuring of education from the preschool field through the compulsory years of schooling provision and into higher education (Gallagher, 2018;Harrison, Smith, & Kinton, 2016;Lizotte, 2013). In schools, this restructuring centers not only on the sociospatial organization of provision (e.g., increasing diversity in school type and questions about equality of access), but also on the curriculum (for example, increased efforts to produce competitive, self-managing emotionally-competent workers for the neoliberal age) (Gagen, 2015;Hankins & Martin, 2006;Ledwith & Reilly, 2013;Malmberg, Andersson, & Bergsten, 2014;Witten, Kearns, Lewis, Coster, & McCreanor, 2003).…”