2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insights on Chinese cave δ18O records and their paleoclimatic significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of precession variations in the sea surface water δ 18 O record at IODP Site U1429 ) is understandable as well, since the precipitation in the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River, its source of freshwater, has little precession changes itself (Figure 1a). This explanation may partially clarify the aforementioned "sea-land precession phase paradox" and relevant misunderstandings (e.g., Liu et al, 2020b). The precession phase of freshwater variations at ODP Site 1146 in the South China Sea may depend on the relative contributions of runoff from the Pearl River and local precipitation.…”
Section: Precession Phase Differences Between Marine and Speleothem Recordsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The absence of precession variations in the sea surface water δ 18 O record at IODP Site U1429 ) is understandable as well, since the precipitation in the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River, its source of freshwater, has little precession changes itself (Figure 1a). This explanation may partially clarify the aforementioned "sea-land precession phase paradox" and relevant misunderstandings (e.g., Liu et al, 2020b). The precession phase of freshwater variations at ODP Site 1146 in the South China Sea may depend on the relative contributions of runoff from the Pearl River and local precipitation.…”
Section: Precession Phase Differences Between Marine and Speleothem Recordsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The P ann index for the Qinghai Lake basin is also not completely consistent with speleothem oxygen isotope records from the ISM region, which are regarded as an indicator of ISM intensity (Dutt et al., 2015; Fleitmann et al., 2003; Kathayat et al., 2017; Neff et al., 2001). A δ 18 O stack consisting of the records from Qunf Cave (Fleitmann et al., 2003), Sahiya Cave (Kathayat et al., 2017), Hoti Cave (Neff et al., 2001), and Mawmluh Cave (Dutt et al., 2015), indicates that maximum ISM precipitation occurred between 10 and 7 ka (Figure 8c; X. K. Liu et al., 2020), with a ∼2 kyr lead relative to the end of the precipitation maximum in the Qinghai Lake basin. In addition, the P ann index for the Qinghai Lake basin is inconsistent with a summer precipitation record from the LJW10 loess section in Xinjiang, where the climate is dominated by the westerlies circulation (Chen et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Comparison of (a) composite P ann record for the Qinghai Lake basin with (b) pollen‐based P ann record from Gonghai Lake (Chen et al., 2015), (c) integrated ISM proxy based on four cave δ 18 O records (Sahiya, Hoti, Mawmluh, and Qunf) (X. K. Liu et al., 2020), (d) summer precipitation record from the LJW10 loess section (Xie et al., 2018). (e) Relationship between curve (a) and standardized curves (b) and (c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The opposite situations occurred when the Asian summer monsoon became weaker. However, Chinese stalagmite δ 18 O record does not necessarily represent the amount of summer monsoon precipitation and its interpretation is time scale dependent (Hu et al., 2019; X Liu et al., 2020). The stalagmite δ 18 O is possibly also associated with the change in moisture source controlled by the intensity of monsoonal circulation at interannual scales, and increased moisture delivery from remote source regions will lead to more negative precipitation δ 18 O over China when the Asian summer monsoon is stronger (Hu et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%